2015 State Report for County-Level Data: Poverty

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the following individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort: Deb Brucker, Erin Dame, Adam Lavoie, Kate Filanoski, Karen Volle, and Anna Brennan-Curry.

Funding for this publication is made possible by:

The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), grant number 90RTGE0001-01-00; and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement (EPM-RRTC), also funded by NIDILRR, grant number 90RT5037-03-00. The information developed by the StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC does not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government (Edgar, 75.620 (b)).

The StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC are part of the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire. The Institute on Disability/UCED (IOD) was established in 1987 to provide a university-based focus for the improvement of knowledge, policies, and practices related to the lives of people with disabilities and their families and is New Hampshire’s University Center for Excellence in Disability (UCED). Located within the University of New Hampshire, the IOD is a federally designated center authorized by the Developmental Disabilities Act. Through innovative and interdisciplinary research, academic, service, and dissemination initiatives, the IOD builds local, state, and national capacities to respond to the needs of individuals with disabilities and their families.

Institute on Disability / UCED

UNH.png

10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101 | Durham, NH 03284              603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | contact.iod@unh.edu | https://www.iod.unh.edu

Stay Connected:
facebook.png instragram.png linkedin.png Twitter.jpg youtube.png       

 

Copyright 2019. Institute on Disability. University of New Hampshire.      

 

 

 

2015 Oklahoma Report for County-Level Data: Poverty

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on

Disability Statistics and Demographics

A NIDILRR-Funded Center

NIDILIRR.jpg

Introduction

The State Reports for County-Level Data on Poverty are designed to provide the users of disability statistics with the number and percentage in poverty for civilians with disabilities, ages 18 to 64 years and living in the community, for any given state and county in the United States (U.S.). This report is intended to be an online complement to Section 3: Poverty of the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, providing greater detail within each state. The State Reports for County-Level Data on Poverty can be used to compare county-level statistics between counties in any given state or states. The following report provides county-level statistics for Oklahoma.

The proportion of the civilian non-institutionalized population with disabilities in poverty, also called the poverty rate, presented in the State Reports for County-Level Data is a useful tool for advocates, researchers, and policy-makers to plan and provide services and supports for people with disabilities experiencing poverty. In this report, poverty of people with disabilities is presented as the number of civilians with disabilities, ages 18 to 64 years and living in the community, in a given state and county per total state and county populations, respectively. Counts and percentages (the poverty rate) are provided in tables and maps.

The data for this report come from the American Community Survey 5-year data. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a national survey developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to provide information on a number of topics about social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the U.S. population. ACS 5-year data is collected over a longer period of time than 1-year data, providing larger sample sizes and increased reliability for less populated areas and small population subgroups. All of the statistics in this report use the ACS 5-year data which includes data from 2015, the year of the report, and data from the four previous years. In the ACS, people are identified as having a disability based on responses to a series of six questions asking about having difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, and independent living (see glossary for further details). 

Poverty is defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget and set as a dollar threshold by the U.S. Census Bureau (see the glossary for further details).

 

 

Specific to Oklahoma, the state chosen for this report, sentences providing interpretation and context for poverty statistics are included on the following page. A short glossary of terms is also provided at the end of the report explaining the statistics that are illustrated in each sentence.

Additional Resources. The Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and its complement, the Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, are summaries of statistics about people with disabilities, available both in hard copy and online at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org

Help navigating any of the resources described here can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions section at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org/faq. Assistance interpreting and locating additional statistics is available via our toll-free number, 866.538.9521, or by email, disability.statistics@unh.edu. For more information about our research projects, please visit https://www.researchondisability.org.

Suggested Citation. Boege, S.L., Lauer, E.A., & Houtenville, A.J., 2019. 2015 State Report for Oklahoma County-Level Data: Poverty. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

Interpretation

The following statements are designed to help understand the 2015 county-level poverty statistics from Oklahoma that are presented:

 

  • For people with disabilities: 
    • The poverty rate for people with disabilities in Oklahoma was 28.3%.
    • The range, also known as the difference between largest and smallest values, of poverty rates for people with disabilities across Oklahoma counties was 46.3%.
      • The county with the greatest poverty rate for people with disabilities was Greer (51.7%).
      • The county with the smallest poverty rate for people with disabilities was Beaver (5.4%).
    • The median, also known as the middle-most, poverty rate for people with disabilities across all counties in Oklahoma was 28.2%.

 

  • For people without disabilities:
    • The poverty rate for people without disabilities in Oklahoma was 13.9%.
    • The range, also known as the difference between largest and smallest values, of poverty rates for people without disabilities across Oklahoma counties was 24.6%.
      • The county with the greatest poverty rate for people without disabilities was Payne (29.9%).
      • The county with the smallest poverty rate for people without disabilities was Kingfisher (5.3%).
    • The median, also known as the middle-most, poverty rate for people without disabilities across all counties in Oklahoma was 13.7%.
Civilians with and without Disabilities in Poverty Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for Oklahoma, by County: 2015
County Disability No Disability   County Disability No Disability
Total Count % [1] Total Count % [2] Total Count % [1] Total Count % [2]
  Oklahoma   317,497 89,753 28.3 1,946,860 270,532 13.9    Grady       4,258    887 20.8    27,816   2,932 10.5
   Adair       2,200    829 37.7    10,905   2,345 21.5    Grant         285     36 12.6     2,187     203  9.3
  Alfalfa        400     98 24.5     2,280     243 10.7    Greer         354    183 51.7     2,474     284 11.5
   Atoka       1,488    586 39.4     5,466     906 16.6    Harmon        276     78 28.3     1,288     183 14.2
   Beaver        224     12  5.4     2,916     226  7.8    Harper        173     41 23.7     1,947     178  9.1
  Beckham      1,801    480 26.7    11,169   1,332 11.9   Haskell      1,632    560 34.3     5,591     925 16.5
   Blaine        738    171 23.2     3,341     457 13.7    Hughes      1,209    437 36.1     5,468     663 12.1
   Bryan       4,621  1,358 29.4    20,900   3,477 16.6   Jackson      1,888    572 30.3    12,375   1,876 15.2
   Caddo       2,862    597 20.9    13,597   2,837 20.9  Jefferson       730    234 32.1     2,812     493 17.5
  Canadian     9,078  1,376 15.2    67,122   3,984  5.9   Johnston     1,612    434 26.9     4,649     684 14.7
   Carter      4,587  1,323 28.8    23,645   2,492 10.5     Kay        4,001  1,337 33.4    21,675   3,164 14.6
  Cherokee     4,589  1,361 29.7    23,812   4,944 20.8  Kingfisher    1,325    132 10.0     7,526     401  5.3
  Choctaw      1,757    719 40.9     6,730   1,699 25.2    Kiowa         885    305 34.5     4,328     774 17.9
  Cimarron       109     21 19.3     1,123     140 12.5   Latimer      1,194    307 25.7     4,853     767 15.8
 Cleveland    18,858  3,913 20.7   147,197  18,645 12.7   Le Flore     5,544  1,999 36.1    23,199   4,473 19.3
    Coal         542    153 28.2     2,686     413 15.4   Lincoln      3,702  1,028 27.8    16,330   2,149 13.2
  Comanche    11,561  3,515 30.4    57,232   8,252 14.4    Logan       2,864    683 23.8    23,469   2,292  9.8
   Cotton        676    245 36.2     2,810     351 12.5     Love         879    190 21.6     4,641     472 10.2
   Craig       1,596    436 27.3     6,535   1,017 15.6    Major         715    169 23.6     3,584     374 10.4
   Creek       6,388  1,532 24.0    35,251   4,470 12.7   Marshall     2,548    611 24.0     6,270     842 13.4
   Custer      2,128    395 18.6    14,793   2,729 18.4    Mayes       4,351  1,671 38.4    19,488   3,186 16.3
  Delaware     4,448  1,283 28.8    18,766   3,438 18.3   McClain      2,579    534 20.7    19,063   1,802  9.5
   Dewey         362     71 19.6     2,268     306 13.5  McCurtain     3,636  1,269 34.9    15,257   3,248 21.3
   Ellis         271     52 19.2     2,003     245 12.2   McIntosh     2,348    823 35.1     8,738   1,614 18.5
  Garfield     4,615    902 19.5    30,822   3,409 11.1    Murray      1,325    292 22.0     6,459     821 12.7
   Garvin      1,918    638 33.3    13,938   2,292 16.4   Muskogee     6,884  2,552 37.1    32,193   5,720 17.8
Civilians with and without Disabilities in Poverty Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for Oklahoma, by County: 2015
County Disability No Disability   County Disability No Disability
Total Count % [1] Total Count % [2] Total Count % [1] Total Count % [2]
   Noble       1,097    383 34.9     5,570     599 10.8                                                        
   Nowata        986    300 30.4     5,051     818 16.2                                                        
  Okfuskee     1,389    628 45.2     5,160   1,029 19.9                                                        
  Oklahoma    54,227 16,506 30.4   401,536  59,729 14.9                                                        
  Okmulgee     4,122  1,364 33.1    18,250   2,906 15.9                                                        
   Osage       4,306  1,082 25.1    22,715   2,723 12.0                                                        
   Ottawa      2,959    951 32.1    14,808   2,766 18.7                                                        
   Pawnee      1,545    375 24.3     7,997     941 11.8                                                        
   Payne       4,896  1,353 27.6    42,866  12,837 29.9                                                        
 Pittsburg     5,022  1,544 30.7    20,178   3,025 15.0                                                        
  Pontotoc     2,939    923 31.4    19,226   3,223 16.8                                                        
Pottawatomie   6,557  1,907 29.1    33,525   5,048 15.1                                                        
 Pushmataha    1,709    599 35.0     4,591     828 18.0                                                        
Roger Mills      208     53 25.5     1,879     228 12.1                                                        
   Rogers      7,128  1,216 17.1    46,015   3,520  7.6                                                        
  Seminole     2,819    964 34.2    11,397   2,039 17.9                                                        
  Sequoyah     5,784  1,937 33.5    18,592   3,854 20.7                                                        
  Stephens     4,467  1,213 27.2    21,418   2,565 12.0                                                        
   Texas         807    214 26.5    12,220   1,243 10.2                                                        
  Tillman        722    260 36.0     3,517     691 19.6                                                        
   Tulsa      45,745 13,299 29.1   334,248  40,421 12.1                                                        
  Wagoner      6,604  1,566 23.7    38,507   3,093  8.0                                                        
 Washington    4,005  1,085 27.1    25,557   2,917 11.4                                                        
  Washita        743    129 17.4     5,907     676 11.4                                                        
   Woods         491    169 34.4     4,498     610 13.6                                                        
  Woodward     1,206    303 25.1    10,645   1,034  9.7                                                        
Count of Civilians in Poverty with Disabilities Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for Oklahoma, by County: 2015

Poverty Rate for Civilians with Disabilities Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for Oklahoma, by County: 2015

Discussion

There are a number of concepts and factors which complicate the interpretation of the estimates presented in this report. These concerns affect all statistics from population-based surveys. The estimates included in this document should be interpreted the following limitations in mind and generalized with caution. In each point, a link to the U.S. Census Bureau website describing the limitation or concept in greater detail in the ACS has been provided.

Additional links to resources for the ACS:

Glossary

American Community Survey (ACS) — The American Community Survey is a large, continuous demographic survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that will provide accurate and up-to-date profiles of America’s communities every year. Annual and multiyear estimates of population and housing data are generated for small areas, including tracts and population subgroups. This information is collected by mailing questionnaires to a sample of addresses. See the U.S. Census Bureau website for additional details.

The Six Disability Questions in the American Community Survey:

  1. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? (yes or no)
  2. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses? (yes or no)
  3. (If person 5 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions? (yes or no)
  4. (If person 5 years or old over) Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? (yes or no)
  5. (If person 5 years old or over) Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? (yes or no)
  6. (If person 15 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? (yes or no)

Average — The sum of all of the values in a sample divided by the number of values in the sample.

Civilian — A person not in active-duty military.

Living in the Community – A person lives in the community, if the person is not living in an institution, such as jail, prison, nursing home, and hospital. A college dormitory is not considered an institution.

Median — The middle-most value of a sample that separates the upper half of the values from the lower half of the values. 

Non-Institutionalized Population — Describes individuals who are residing in the community and who are not living in institutions such as jails, prisons, nursing homes, hospitals, etc.

Population — The total number of inhabitants in a defined geographic area including all races, classes, and groups.

Poverty — The U.S. Office of Management and Budget in Statistical Policy, Directive 14 sets the standards for which poverty is calculated. The U.S. Census Bureau uses a set of dollar value thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine who is in poverty. If a family’s total income is less than the dollar value of the appropriate threshold, then that family and every individual in it is considered to be in poverty.

Poverty Rate — Percent of the population who are determined to be in poverty.

Range — The difference between the largest and smallest values in a sample. In a sample, when the smallest value is subtracted from the largest value the resulting value is called the range. 

Sampling Variability — The variation of a statistic when estimated from repeated samples.

United States Census Bureau — An agency within the United States Federal Statistical System tasked with producing data about the American people and economy. Their primary task is to conduct the United States Census every ten years.

About the Center

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the StatsRRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: American Association of People with Disabilities, Center for Essential Management Services, Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and Public Health Institute.

The StatsRRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RTGE00010100, from 2018–2023.

Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (EPM-RRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the EPM-RRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: Association of University Centers on Disability, Hunter College, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and the University of Chicago.

The EPM-RRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RT503701, from 2015–2020.

Contact Information
University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824
Toll-Free Telephone/TTY: 866-538-9521
E-mail: Disability.Statistics@unh.edu
https://www.researchondisability.org