2015 State Report for County-Level Data: Poverty

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the following individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort: Deb Brucker, Erin Dame, Adam Lavoie, Kate Filanoski, Karen Volle, and Anna Brennan-Curry.

Funding for this publication is made possible by:

The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), grant number 90RTGE0001-01-00; and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement (EPM-RRTC), also funded by NIDILRR, grant number 90RT5037-03-00. The information developed by the StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC does not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government (Edgar, 75.620 (b)).

The StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC are part of the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire. The Institute on Disability/UCED (IOD) was established in 1987 to provide a university-based focus for the improvement of knowledge, policies, and practices related to the lives of people with disabilities and their families and is New Hampshire’s University Center for Excellence in Disability (UCED). Located within the University of New Hampshire, the IOD is a federally designated center authorized by the Developmental Disabilities Act. Through innovative and interdisciplinary research, academic, service, and dissemination initiatives, the IOD builds local, state, and national capacities to respond to the needs of individuals with disabilities and their families.

Institute on Disability / UCED

UNH.png

10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101 | Durham, NH 03284              603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | contact.iod@unh.edu | https://www.iod.unh.edu

Stay Connected:
facebook.png instragram.png linkedin.png Twitter.jpg youtube.png       

 

Copyright 2019. Institute on Disability. University of New Hampshire.      

 

 

 

2015 Tennessee Report for County-Level Data: Poverty

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on

Disability Statistics and Demographics

A NIDILRR-Funded Center

NIDILIRR.jpg

Introduction

The State Reports for County-Level Data on Poverty are designed to provide the users of disability statistics with the number and percentage in poverty for civilians with disabilities, ages 18 to 64 years and living in the community, for any given state and county in the United States (U.S.). This report is intended to be an online complement to Section 3: Poverty of the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, providing greater detail within each state. The State Reports for County-Level Data on Poverty can be used to compare county-level statistics between counties in any given state or states. The following report provides county-level statistics for Tennessee.

The proportion of the civilian non-institutionalized population with disabilities in poverty, also called the poverty rate, presented in the State Reports for County-Level Data is a useful tool for advocates, researchers, and policy-makers to plan and provide services and supports for people with disabilities experiencing poverty. In this report, poverty of people with disabilities is presented as the number of civilians with disabilities, ages 18 to 64 years and living in the community, in a given state and county per total state and county populations, respectively. Counts and percentages (the poverty rate) are provided in tables and maps.

The data for this report come from the American Community Survey 5-year data. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a national survey developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to provide information on a number of topics about social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the U.S. population. ACS 5-year data is collected over a longer period of time than 1-year data, providing larger sample sizes and increased reliability for less populated areas and small population subgroups. All of the statistics in this report use the ACS 5-year data which includes data from 2015, the year of the report, and data from the four previous years. In the ACS, people are identified as having a disability based on responses to a series of six questions asking about having difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, and independent living (see glossary for further details). 

Poverty is defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget and set as a dollar threshold by the U.S. Census Bureau (see the glossary for further details).

 

 

Specific to Tennessee, the state chosen for this report, sentences providing interpretation and context for poverty statistics are included on the following page. A short glossary of terms is also provided at the end of the report explaining the statistics that are illustrated in each sentence.

Additional Resources. The Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and its complement, the Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, are summaries of statistics about people with disabilities, available both in hard copy and online at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org

Help navigating any of the resources described here can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions section at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org/faq. Assistance interpreting and locating additional statistics is available via our toll-free number, 866.538.9521, or by email, disability.statistics@unh.edu. For more information about our research projects, please visit https://www.researchondisability.org.

Suggested Citation. Boege, S.L., Lauer, E.A., & Houtenville, A.J., 2019. 2015 State Report for Tennessee County-Level Data: Poverty. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

Interpretation

The following statements are designed to help understand the 2015 county-level poverty statistics from Tennessee that are presented:

 

  • For people with disabilities: 
    • The poverty rate for people with disabilities in Tennessee was 31.2%.
    • The range, also known as the difference between largest and smallest values, of poverty rates for people with disabilities across Tennessee counties was 37.4%.
      • The county with the greatest poverty rate for people with disabilities was Johnson (50.9%).
      • The county with the smallest poverty rate for people with disabilities was Williamson (13.5%).
    • The median, also known as the middle-most, poverty rate for people with disabilities across all counties in Tennessee was 33.7%.

 

  • For people without disabilities:
    • The poverty rate for people without disabilities in Tennessee was 14.2%.
    • The range, also known as the difference between largest and smallest values, of poverty rates for people without disabilities across Tennessee counties was 21.3%.
      • The county with the greatest poverty rate for people without disabilities was Grundy (25.4%).
      • The county with the smallest poverty rate for people without disabilities was Williamson (4.1%).
    • The median, also known as the middle-most, poverty rate for people without disabilities across all counties in Tennessee was 15.3%.
Civilians with and without Disabilities in Poverty Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for Tennessee, by County: 2015
County Disability No Disability   County Disability No Disability
Total Count % [1] Total Count % [2] Total Count % [1] Total Count % [2]
Tennessee  542,120 168,939 31.2 3,389,979 479,869 14.2  Franklin    3,540   1,238 35.0    19,594   2,855 14.6
 Anderson    7,666   2,589 33.8    37,250   4,994 13.4   Gibson     4,416   1,372 31.1    23,951   3,381 14.1
 Bedford     4,123   1,212 29.4    22,954   3,122 13.6   Giles      2,595   1,054 40.6    14,381   1,811 12.6
  Benton     1,979     740 37.4     7,368   1,455 19.7  Grainger    2,709     976 36.0    11,110   1,882 16.9
 Bledsoe     1,923     744 38.7     5,652     996 17.6   Greene     8,354   2,723 32.6    32,056   5,146 16.1
  Blount     9,931   2,924 29.4    64,904   7,253 11.2   Grundy     1,826     764 41.8     5,930   1,507 25.4
 Bradley    10,346   2,867 27.7    50,689   8,336 16.4  Hamblen     6,540   1,816 27.8    30,544   5,877 19.2
 Campbell    5,490   2,279 41.5    18,547   3,269 17.6  Hamilton   26,124   7,810 29.9   186,592  24,209 13.0
  Cannon     1,567     589 37.6     6,757     894 13.2  Hancock     1,063     407 38.3     2,853     620 21.7
 Carroll     2,862   1,138 39.8    13,328   2,352 17.6  Hardeman    2,294     932 40.6    11,255   2,436 21.6
  Carter     6,711   2,341 34.9    27,089   5,621 20.8   Hardin     2,830     948 33.5    12,243   2,474 20.2
 Cheatham    3,575     914 25.6    21,208   2,357 11.1  Hawkins     6,964   2,408 34.6    26,898   3,645 13.6
 Chester     1,022     423 41.4     8,617   1,491 17.3  Haywood     1,880     701 37.3     9,006   1,542 17.1
Claiborne    3,869   1,532 39.6    15,039   2,559 17.0 Henderson    2,901   1,229 42.4    13,731   2,041 14.9
   Clay        877     402 45.8     3,487     603 17.3   Henry      3,747   1,329 35.5    14,638   2,121 14.5
  Cocke      4,284   1,642 38.3    16,853   3,526 20.9  Hickman     3,122   1,000 32.0    10,788   1,651 15.3
  Coffee     5,793   1,827 31.5    25,668   3,897 15.2  Houston       993     340 34.2     3,732     641 17.2
 Crockett    1,570     568 36.2     6,918   1,010 14.6 Humphreys    1,730     482 27.9     9,004   1,227 13.6
Cumberland   6,319   2,393 37.9    24,043   3,337 13.9  Jackson     1,615     484 30.0     5,205   1,165 22.4
 Davidson   43,791  13,594 31.0   382,688  54,625 14.3 Jefferson    5,624   1,883 33.5    24,946   3,023 12.1
  DeKalb     2,209     753 34.1     9,148   1,525 16.7  Johnson     2,138   1,088 50.9     7,335   1,412 19.3
 Decatur     1,171     410 35.0     5,416     983 18.1    Knox     30,635   9,821 32.1   246,489  34,876 14.1
 Dickson     5,105   1,202 23.5    25,400   3,404 13.4    Lake        767     303 39.5     2,158     403 18.7
   Dyer      3,928   1,207 30.7    18,567   2,310 12.4 Lauderdale   3,395   1,499 44.2    11,261   2,296 20.4
 Fayette     3,217     759 23.6    20,260   2,161 10.7  Lawrence    3,758   1,294 34.4    20,431   3,029 14.8
 Fentress    2,438     864 35.4     7,876   1,844 23.4   Lewis      1,276     477 37.4     5,603     915 16.3
Civilians with and without Disabilities in Poverty Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for Tennessee, by County: 2015
County Disability No Disability   County Disability No Disability
Total Count % [1] Total Count % [2] Total Count % [1] Total Count % [2]
 Lincoln     3,905     954 24.4    15,870   2,109 13.3   Sevier     9,463   2,460 26.0    47,446   6,277 13.2
  Loudon     3,991     840 21.0    23,967   2,700 11.3   Shelby    66,157  21,126 31.9   512,594  84,723 16.5
  Macon      2,577     975 37.8    11,018   1,557 14.1   Smith      1,869     557 29.8     9,610   1,101 11.5
 Madison     8,350   2,714 32.5    49,868   7,726 15.5  Stewart     1,329     480 36.1     6,408     818 12.8
  Marion     3,267     988 30.2    13,763   2,076 15.1  Sullivan   16,305   5,686 34.9    76,553   9,903 12.9
 Marshall    2,809   1,086 38.7    16,189   1,774 11.0   Sumner    10,929   2,329 21.3    92,158   6,768  7.3
  Maury      6,912   1,706 24.7    44,495   5,062 11.4   Tipton     4,610     912 19.8    32,613   3,750 11.5
  McMinn     5,168   1,394 27.0    25,609   4,513 17.6 Trousdale      768     207 27.0     4,024     634 15.8
 McNairy     2,821   1,145 40.6    12,190   2,003 16.4   Unicoi     2,578     868 33.7     8,035   1,549 19.3
  Meigs      1,762     670 38.0     5,162     805 15.6   Union      2,197     825 37.6     9,459   1,559 16.5
  Monroe     4,321   1,328 30.7    22,386   3,398 15.2 Van Buren      685     223 32.6     2,654     304 11.5
Montgomery  14,823   3,572 24.1    90,988  12,478 13.7   Warren     4,323   1,411 32.6    19,275   3,333 17.3
  Moore        407      61 15.0     3,316     268  8.1 Washington  11,393   3,413 30.0    65,022  11,079 17.0
  Morgan     2,197     720 32.8     8,853   1,604 18.1   Wayne      1,629     584 35.9     7,248   1,180 16.3
  Obion      3,147     930 29.6    15,217   2,661 17.5  Weakley     2,739     861 31.4    16,977   3,086 18.2
 Overton     2,064     779 37.7    10,696   1,857 17.4   White      2,699   1,024 37.9    12,566   1,941 15.4
  Perry        844     322 38.2     3,653     739 20.2 Williamson   6,678     899 13.5   113,888   4,638  4.1
 Pickett       401     111 27.7     2,433     333 13.7   Wilson     7,819   1,720 22.0    66,834   5,313  7.9
   Polk      1,816     511 28.1     8,050   1,083 13.5                                                       
  Putnam     5,692   2,085 36.6    38,357   9,589 25.0                                                       
   Rhea      4,718   2,023 42.9    13,984   2,339 16.7                                                       
  Roane      6,212   2,109 34.0    25,179   3,699 14.7                                                       
Robertson    5,074     996 19.6    36,105   3,417  9.5                                                       
Rutherford  15,095   3,175 21.0   165,279  18,956 11.5                                                       
  Scott      3,192   1,305 40.9     9,904   2,089 21.1                                                       
Sequatchie   1,783     564 31.6     6,624     969 14.6                                                       
Count of Civilians in Poverty with Disabilities Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for Tennessee, by County: 2015

Poverty Rate for Civilians with Disabilities Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for Tennessee, by County: 2015

Discussion

There are a number of concepts and factors which complicate the interpretation of the estimates presented in this report. These concerns affect all statistics from population-based surveys. The estimates included in this document should be interpreted the following limitations in mind and generalized with caution. In each point, a link to the U.S. Census Bureau website describing the limitation or concept in greater detail in the ACS has been provided.

Additional links to resources for the ACS:

Glossary

American Community Survey (ACS) — The American Community Survey is a large, continuous demographic survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that will provide accurate and up-to-date profiles of America’s communities every year. Annual and multiyear estimates of population and housing data are generated for small areas, including tracts and population subgroups. This information is collected by mailing questionnaires to a sample of addresses. See the U.S. Census Bureau website for additional details.

The Six Disability Questions in the American Community Survey:

  1. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? (yes or no)
  2. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses? (yes or no)
  3. (If person 5 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions? (yes or no)
  4. (If person 5 years or old over) Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? (yes or no)
  5. (If person 5 years old or over) Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? (yes or no)
  6. (If person 15 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? (yes or no)

Average — The sum of all of the values in a sample divided by the number of values in the sample.

Civilian — A person not in active-duty military.

Living in the Community – A person lives in the community, if the person is not living in an institution, such as jail, prison, nursing home, and hospital. A college dormitory is not considered an institution.

Median — The middle-most value of a sample that separates the upper half of the values from the lower half of the values. 

Non-Institutionalized Population — Describes individuals who are residing in the community and who are not living in institutions such as jails, prisons, nursing homes, hospitals, etc.

Population — The total number of inhabitants in a defined geographic area including all races, classes, and groups.

Poverty — The U.S. Office of Management and Budget in Statistical Policy, Directive 14 sets the standards for which poverty is calculated. The U.S. Census Bureau uses a set of dollar value thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine who is in poverty. If a family’s total income is less than the dollar value of the appropriate threshold, then that family and every individual in it is considered to be in poverty.

Poverty Rate — Percent of the population who are determined to be in poverty.

Range — The difference between the largest and smallest values in a sample. In a sample, when the smallest value is subtracted from the largest value the resulting value is called the range. 

Sampling Variability — The variation of a statistic when estimated from repeated samples.

United States Census Bureau — An agency within the United States Federal Statistical System tasked with producing data about the American people and economy. Their primary task is to conduct the United States Census every ten years.

About the Center

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the StatsRRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: American Association of People with Disabilities, Center for Essential Management Services, Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and Public Health Institute.

The StatsRRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RTGE00010100, from 2018–2023.

Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (EPM-RRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the EPM-RRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: Association of University Centers on Disability, Hunter College, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and the University of Chicago.

The EPM-RRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RT503701, from 2015–2020.

Contact Information
University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824
Toll-Free Telephone/TTY: 866-538-9521
E-mail: Disability.Statistics@unh.edu
https://www.researchondisability.org