2016 State Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the following individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort: Deb Brucker, Erin Dame, Adam Lavoie, Kate Filanoski, Karen Volle, and Anna Brennan-Curry.

Funding for this publication is made possible by:

The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), grant number 90RTGE0001-01-00; and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement (EPM-RRTC), also funded by NIDILRR, grant number 90RT5037-03-00. The information developed by the StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC does not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government (Edgar, 75.620 (b)).

The StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC are part of the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire. The Institute on Disability/UCED (IOD) was established in 1987 to provide a university-based focus for the improvement of knowledge, policies, and practices related to the lives of people with disabilities and their families and is New Hampshire’s University Center for Excellence in Disability (UCED). Located within the University of New Hampshire, the IOD is a federally designated center authorized by the Developmental Disabilities Act. Through innovative and interdisciplinary research, academic, service, and dissemination initiatives, the IOD builds local, state, and national capacities to respond to the needs of individuals with disabilities and their families.

Institute on Disability / UCED

UNH.png

10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101 | Durham, NH 03284              603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | contact.iod@unh.edu | https://www.iod.unh.edu

Stay Connected:
facebook.png instragram.png linkedin.png Twitter.jpg youtube.png       

 

Copyright 2019. Institute on Disability. University of New Hampshire.      

 

 

 

2016 Montana Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on

Disability Statistics and Demographics

A NIDILRR-Funded Center

NIDILIRR.jpg

Introduction

The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence are designed to provide the users of disability statistics with the number of people with disabilities for any given state and county in the United States. This report is intended to be an online complement to Section 1: Population and Prevalence of the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, providing greater detail within each state. The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence can be used to compare county-level statistics between counties in any given state or states.

The following report provides county-level statistics for Montana. The proportions of people with disabilities, sometimes called prevalence, presented in the State Reports for County-Level Data is a useful tool for advocates, researchers, and policy-makers to plan and provide services and supports for people with disabilities. In this report, the prevalence of people with disabilities is presented as the number of people with disabilities in a given state and county per total state and county populations, respectively. Counts and percentages are provided in tables and maps.

The data for this report come from the American Community Survey 5-year data. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a national survey developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to provide information on a number of topics about social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the U.S. population. ACS 5-year data is collected over a longer period of time than 1-year data, providing larger sample sizes and increased reliability for less populated areas and small population subgroups. All of the statistics in this report use the ACS 5-year data which includes data from the year of the report and data from the four previous years. In the ACS, people are identified as having a disability based on responses to a series of six questions asking about having difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, and independent living (see glossary for further details).

Specific to Montana, the state chosen for this report, sentences providing interpretation and context for prevalence statistics are included below. A short glossary of terms is also provided at the end of the report explaining the statistics that are illustrated in each sentence.

 

 

Additional Resources. The Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and its complement, the Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, are summaries of statistics about people with disabilities, available both in hard copy and online at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org

Help navigating any of the resources described here can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions section at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org/faq. Assistance interpreting and locating additional statistics is available via our toll-free number, 866.538.9521, or by email, disability.statistics@unh.edu. For more information about our research projects, please visit https://www.researchondisability.org.

Suggested Citation. Boege, S.L., Lauer, E.A., & Houtenville, A.J., 2019. 2016 State Report for Montana County-Level Data: Prevalence. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

Interpretation

The following statements are designed to help understand the 2016 county-level statistics from Montana that are presented:

  • For the number of people with and without disabilities:
    • The range of total people across Montana counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people across Montana counties, was 152,556.
      • The county with the greatest number of total people was Yellowstone (153,001 people).
      • The county with the least number of total people was Petroleum (445 people).
    • The average number of total people across all counties was 17,999.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of total people across Montana counties was 6,988.
  • For the number of people with disabilities: 
    • The range of people with disabilities across Montana counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people with disabilities across Montana counties, was 19,876.
      • The county with the greatest number of people with disabilities was Yellowstone (19,926 people).
      • The county with the least number of people with disabilities was Petroleum (50 people).
    • The average number of people with disabilities across all counties was 2,434.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people with disabilities across Montana counties was 1,051.
  • For the percentage of people with disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Montana, the overall percentage of people with disabilities is 13.5%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people with disabilities was Deer Lodge (23.6%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people with disabilities was Gallatin (8.0%).

 

  • For the number of people without disabilities:
    • The range of people without disabilities across Montana counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people without disabilities across Montana counties, was 132,680.
      • The county with the greatest number of people without disabilities was Yellowstone (133,075 people).
      • The county with the least number of people without disabilities was Petroleum (395 people).
    • The average number of people without disabilities across all counties was 15,565.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people without disabilities across Montana counties was 5,827.
  • For the percentage of people without disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Montana, the overall percentage of people without disabilities is 86.5%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people without disabilities was Gallatin (92.0%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people without disabilities was Deer Lodge (76.4%).
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Montana, by County: 2016
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
    Montana     1,007,946 136,325 13.5 871,621 86.5     Liberty         2,270     388 17.1   1,882 82.9
  Beaverhead        9,186   1,330 14.5   7,856 85.5     Lincoln        19,098   4,031 21.1  15,067 78.9
   Big Horn        13,075   1,377 10.5  11,698 89.5     Madison         7,750     961 12.4   6,789 87.6
    Blaine          6,513   1,250 19.2   5,263 80.8     McCone          1,656     228 13.8   1,428 86.2
  Broadwater        5,646     923 16.3   4,723 83.7     Meagher         1,933     318 16.5   1,615 83.5
    Carbon         10,260   1,582 15.4   8,678 84.6     Mineral         4,169     931 22.3   3,238 77.7
    Carter          1,273     172 13.5   1,101 86.5    Missoula       112,445  13,746 12.2  98,699 87.8
    Cascade        78,264  11,799 15.1  66,465 84.9   Musselshell       4,745     716 15.1   4,029 84.9
   Chouteau         5,793     638 11.0   5,155 89.0      Park          15,757   1,869 11.9  13,888 88.1
    Custer         11,741   1,907 16.2   9,834 83.8    Petroleum          445      50 11.2     395 88.8
    Daniels         1,756     238 13.6   1,518 86.4    Phillips         4,109     706 17.2   3,403 82.8
    Dawson          9,107   1,322 14.5   7,785 85.5     Pondera         6,095   1,029 16.9   5,066 83.1
  Deer Lodge        8,628   2,037 23.6   6,591 76.4  Powder River       1,616     246 15.2   1,370 84.8
    Fallon          2,861     338 11.8   2,523 88.2     Powell          5,324     855 16.1   4,469 83.9
    Fergus         11,236   1,627 14.5   9,609 85.5     Prairie         1,395     224 16.1   1,171 83.9
   Flathead        94,104  10,104 10.7  84,000 89.3     Ravalli        40,885   7,472 18.3  33,413 81.7
   Gallatin        97,611   7,761  8.0  89,850 92.0    Richland        11,392   1,222 10.7  10,170 89.3
   Garfield         1,061     133 12.5     928 87.5    Roosevelt       11,003   1,491 13.6   9,512 86.4
    Glacier        13,564   1,836 13.5  11,728 86.5     Rosebud         9,269   1,513 16.3   7,756 83.7
 Golden Valley        730     127 17.4     603 82.6     Sanders        11,238   2,162 19.2   9,076 80.8
    Granite         3,185     622 19.5   2,563 80.5    Sheridan         3,594     471 13.1   3,123 86.9
     Hill          16,397   2,476 15.1  13,921 84.9   Silver Bow       33,985   6,029 17.7  27,956 82.3
   Jefferson       11,425   1,627 14.2   9,798 85.8   Stillwater        9,290   1,251 13.5   8,039 86.5
 Judith Basin       1,981     251 12.7   1,730 87.3   Sweet Grass       3,607     543 15.1   3,064 84.9
     Lake          29,144   4,229 14.5  24,915 85.5      Teton          6,002     931 15.5   5,071 84.5
Lewis and Clark    65,349   8,924 13.7  56,425 86.3      Toole          4,481     756 16.9   3,725 83.1
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Montana, by County: 2016
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
   Treasure           846     125 14.8     721 85.2                                                    
    Valley          7,462   1,072 14.4   6,390 85.6                                                    
   Wheatland        2,075     279 13.4   1,796 86.6                                                    
    Wibaux          1,119     154 13.8     965 86.2                                                    
  Yellowstone     153,001  19,926 13.0 133,075 87.0                                                    
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
Count of People with Disabilities for Montana, by County: 2016

Percentage of People with Disabilities for Montana, by County: 2016

Discussion

There are a number of concepts and factors which complicate the interpretation of the estimates presented in this report. These concerns affect all statistics from population-based surveys. The estimates included in this document should be interpreted the following limitations in mind and generalized with caution. In each point, a link to the U.S. Census Bureau website describing the limitation or concept in greater detail in the ACS has been provided.

Additional links to resources for the ACS:

Glossary

American Community Survey (ACS) — The American Community Survey is a large, continuous demographic survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that will provide accurate and up-to-date profiles of America’s communities every year. Annual and multiyear estimates of population and housing data are generated for small areas, including tracts and population subgroups. This information is collected by mailing questionnaires to a sample of addresses. See the U.S. Census Bureau website for additional details.

The Six Disability Questions in the American Community Survey:

  1. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? (yes or no)
  2. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses? (yes or no)
  3. (If person 5 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions? (yes or no)
  4. (If person 5 years or old over) Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? (yes or no)
  5. (If person 5 years old or over) Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? (yes or no)
  6. (If person 15 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? (yes or no)

Average — The sum of all of the values in a sample divided by the number of values in the sample.

Civilian — A person not in active-duty military.

Median — The middlemost value of a sample that separates the upper half of the values from the lower half of the values. 

Non-Institutionalized Population — Describes individuals who are residing in the community and who are not living in institutions such as jails, prisons, nursing homes, hospitals, etc.

Population — The total number of inhabitants in a defined geographic area including all races, classes, and groups.

Prevalence — The proportion of the population with a particular status or condition. Prevalence is usually expressed as a percentage or a number of people per unit of the population.

Prevalence Rate — The prevalence of a particular status or condition estimated over a specific period of time.

Range — The difference between the largest and smallest values in a sample. In a sample, when the smallest value is subtracted from the largest value the resulting value is called the range. 

Sampling Variability — The variation of a statistic when estimated from repeated samples.

United States Census Bureau — An agency within the United States Federal Statistical System tasked with producing data about the American people and economy. Their primary task is to conduct the United States Census every ten years.

About the Center

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the StatsRRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: American Association of People with Disabilities, Center for Essential Management Services, Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and Public Health Institute.

The StatsRRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RTGE00010100, from 2018–2023.

Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (EPM-RRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the EPM-RRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: Association of University Centers on Disability, Hunter College, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and the University of Chicago.

The EPM-RRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RT503701, from 2015–2020.

Contact Information
University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824
Toll-Free Telephone/TTY: 866-538-9521
E-mail: Disability.Statistics@unh.edu
https://www.researchondisability.org