2016 State Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the following individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort: Deb Brucker, Erin Dame, Adam Lavoie, Kate Filanoski, Karen Volle, and Anna Brennan-Curry.

Funding for this publication is made possible by:

The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), grant number 90RTGE0001-01-00; and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement (EPM-RRTC), also funded by NIDILRR, grant number 90RT5037-03-00. The information developed by the StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC does not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government (Edgar, 75.620 (b)).

The StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC are part of the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire. The Institute on Disability/UCED (IOD) was established in 1987 to provide a university-based focus for the improvement of knowledge, policies, and practices related to the lives of people with disabilities and their families and is New Hampshire’s University Center for Excellence in Disability (UCED). Located within the University of New Hampshire, the IOD is a federally designated center authorized by the Developmental Disabilities Act. Through innovative and interdisciplinary research, academic, service, and dissemination initiatives, the IOD builds local, state, and national capacities to respond to the needs of individuals with disabilities and their families.

Institute on Disability / UCED

UNH.png

10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101 | Durham, NH 03284              603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | contact.iod@unh.edu | https://www.iod.unh.edu

Stay Connected:
facebook.png instragram.png linkedin.png Twitter.jpg youtube.png       

 

Copyright 2019. Institute on Disability. University of New Hampshire.      

 

 

 

2016 Oklahoma Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on

Disability Statistics and Demographics

A NIDILRR-Funded Center

NIDILIRR.jpg

Introduction

The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence are designed to provide the users of disability statistics with the number of people with disabilities for any given state and county in the United States. This report is intended to be an online complement to Section 1: Population and Prevalence of the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, providing greater detail within each state. The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence can be used to compare county-level statistics between counties in any given state or states.

The following report provides county-level statistics for Oklahoma. The proportions of people with disabilities, sometimes called prevalence, presented in the State Reports for County-Level Data is a useful tool for advocates, researchers, and policy-makers to plan and provide services and supports for people with disabilities. In this report, the prevalence of people with disabilities is presented as the number of people with disabilities in a given state and county per total state and county populations, respectively. Counts and percentages are provided in tables and maps.

The data for this report come from the American Community Survey 5-year data. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a national survey developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to provide information on a number of topics about social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the U.S. population. ACS 5-year data is collected over a longer period of time than 1-year data, providing larger sample sizes and increased reliability for less populated areas and small population subgroups. All of the statistics in this report use the ACS 5-year data which includes data from the year of the report and data from the four previous years. In the ACS, people are identified as having a disability based on responses to a series of six questions asking about having difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, and independent living (see glossary for further details).

Specific to Oklahoma, the state chosen for this report, sentences providing interpretation and context for prevalence statistics are included below. A short glossary of terms is also provided at the end of the report explaining the statistics that are illustrated in each sentence.

 

 

Additional Resources. The Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and its complement, the Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, are summaries of statistics about people with disabilities, available both in hard copy and online at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org

Help navigating any of the resources described here can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions section at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org/faq. Assistance interpreting and locating additional statistics is available via our toll-free number, 866.538.9521, or by email, disability.statistics@unh.edu. For more information about our research projects, please visit https://www.researchondisability.org.

Suggested Citation. Boege, S.L., Lauer, E.A., & Houtenville, A.J., 2019. 2016 State Report for Oklahoma County-Level Data: Prevalence. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

Interpretation

The following statements are designed to help understand the 2016 county-level statistics from Oklahoma that are presented:

  • For the number of people with and without disabilities:
    • The range of total people across Oklahoma counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people across Oklahoma counties, was 749,629.
      • The county with the greatest number of total people was Oklahoma (751,872 people).
      • The county with the least number of total people was Cimarron (2,243 people).
    • The average number of total people across all counties was 49,283.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of total people across Oklahoma counties was 21,719.
  • For the number of people with disabilities: 
    • The range of people with disabilities across Oklahoma counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people with disabilities across Oklahoma counties, was 100,646.
      • The county with the greatest number of people with disabilities was Oklahoma (100,964 people).
      • The county with the least number of people with disabilities was Cimarron (318 people).
    • The average number of people with disabilities across all counties was 7,720.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people with disabilities across Oklahoma counties was 3,874.
  • For the percentage of people with disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Oklahoma, the overall percentage of people with disabilities is 15.7%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people with disabilities was Marshall (31.1%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people with disabilities was Beaver (9.1%).

 

  • For the number of people without disabilities:
    • The range of people without disabilities across Oklahoma counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people without disabilities across Oklahoma counties, was 648,983.
      • The county with the greatest number of people without disabilities was Oklahoma (650,908 people).
      • The county with the least number of people without disabilities was Cimarron (1,925 people).
    • The average number of people without disabilities across all counties was 41,563.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people without disabilities across Oklahoma counties was 18,512.
  • For the percentage of people without disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Oklahoma, the overall percentage of people without disabilities is 84.3%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people without disabilities was Beaver (90.9%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people without disabilities was Marshall (68.9%).
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Oklahoma, by County: 2016
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
  Oklahoma   3,794,815 594,454 15.7 3,200,361 84.3    Grady        53,388   8,206 15.4    45,182 84.6
   Adair        22,035   4,255 19.3    17,780 80.7    Grant         4,422     653 14.8     3,769 85.2
  Alfalfa        4,751     747 15.7     4,004 84.3    Greer         5,035   1,065 21.2     3,970 78.8
   Atoka        12,268   2,889 23.5     9,379 76.5    Harmon        2,709     511 18.9     2,198 81.1
   Beaver        5,398     493  9.1     4,905 90.9    Harper        3,774     472 12.5     3,302 87.5
  Beckham       21,719   3,207 14.8    18,512 85.2   Haskell       12,770   2,967 23.2     9,803 76.8
   Blaine        8,118   1,723 21.2     6,395 78.8    Hughes       12,038   2,506 20.8     9,532 79.2
   Bryan        44,080   9,146 20.7    34,934 79.3   Jackson       24,326   3,706 15.2    20,620 84.8
   Caddo        28,457   5,709 20.1    22,748 79.9  Jefferson       6,132   1,401 22.8     4,731 77.2
  Canadian     127,742  16,956 13.3   110,786 86.7   Johnston      10,905   2,851 26.1     8,054 73.9
   Carter       47,870   8,860 18.5    39,010 81.5     Kay         44,735   8,059 18.0    36,676 82.0
  Cherokee      47,758   8,000 16.8    39,758 83.2  Kingfisher     15,232   2,597 17.0    12,635 83.0
  Choctaw       14,878   3,072 20.6    11,806 79.4    Kiowa         9,045   1,856 20.5     7,189 79.5
  Cimarron       2,243     318 14.2     1,925 85.8   Latimer       10,449   2,486 23.8     7,963 76.2
 Cleveland     266,197  34,682 13.0   231,515 87.0   Le Flore      48,741  10,257 21.0    38,484 79.0
    Coal         5,687   1,161 20.4     4,526 79.6   Lincoln       34,262   6,722 19.6    27,540 80.4
  Comanche     111,780  20,522 18.4    91,258 81.6    Logan        44,809   5,964 13.3    38,845 86.7
   Cotton        5,933   1,137 19.2     4,796 80.8     Love         9,681   1,649 17.0     8,032 83.0
   Craig        13,934   3,197 22.9    10,737 77.1    Major         7,642   1,369 17.9     6,273 82.1
   Creek        70,129  10,164 14.5    59,965 85.5   Marshall      15,821   4,919 31.1    10,902 68.9
   Custer       28,805   3,874 13.4    24,931 86.6    Mayes        40,484   8,508 21.0    31,976 79.0
  Delaware      41,050   9,398 22.9    31,652 77.1   McClain       36,937   5,023 13.6    31,914 86.4
   Dewey         4,759     710 14.9     4,049 85.1  McCurtain      32,662   6,355 19.5    26,307 80.5
   Ellis         4,088     535 13.1     3,553 86.9   McIntosh      19,858   4,825 24.3    15,033 75.7
  Garfield      60,353   8,599 14.2    51,754 85.8    Murray       13,379   2,579 19.3    10,800 80.7
   Garvin       27,337   3,913 14.3    23,424 85.7   Muskogee      67,049  12,370 18.4    54,679 81.6
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Oklahoma, by County: 2016
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
   Noble        11,373   1,933 17.0     9,440 83.0                                                   
   Nowata       10,309   1,965 19.1     8,344 80.9                                                   
  Okfuskee      11,330   2,391 21.1     8,939 78.9                                                   
  Oklahoma     751,872 100,964 13.4   650,908 86.6                                                   
  Okmulgee      38,674   7,430 19.2    31,244 80.8                                                   
   Osage        46,530   8,892 19.1    37,638 80.9                                                   
   Ottawa       31,578   5,856 18.5    25,722 81.5                                                   
   Pawnee       16,289   2,976 18.3    13,313 81.7                                                   
   Payne        78,862   9,159 11.6    69,703 88.4                                                   
 Pittsburg      42,781   9,248 21.6    33,533 78.4                                                   
  Pontotoc      37,782   5,607 14.8    32,175 85.2                                                   
Pottawatomie    69,230  12,341 17.8    56,889 82.2                                                   
 Pushmataha     11,019   3,125 28.4     7,894 71.6                                                   
Roger Mills      3,709     482 13.0     3,227 87.0                                                   
   Rogers       88,947  13,542 15.2    75,405 84.8                                                   
  Seminole      24,951   5,108 20.5    19,843 79.5                                                   
  Sequoyah      40,963  10,029 24.5    30,934 75.5                                                   
  Stephens      44,042   8,681 19.7    35,361 80.3                                                   
   Texas        21,373   2,003  9.4    19,370 90.6                                                   
  Tillman        7,247   1,229 17.0     6,018 83.0                                                   
   Tulsa       624,912  83,533 13.4   541,379 86.6                                                   
  Wagoner       75,899  11,541 15.2    64,358 84.8                                                   
 Washington     51,498   8,337 16.2    43,161 83.8                                                   
  Washita       11,387   1,389 12.2     9,998 87.8                                                   
   Woods         8,489   1,176 13.9     7,313 86.1                                                   
  Woodward      20,115   2,374 11.8    17,741 88.2                                                   
Count of People with Disabilities for Oklahoma, by County: 2016

Percentage of People with Disabilities for Oklahoma, by County: 2016

Discussion

There are a number of concepts and factors which complicate the interpretation of the estimates presented in this report. These concerns affect all statistics from population-based surveys. The estimates included in this document should be interpreted the following limitations in mind and generalized with caution. In each point, a link to the U.S. Census Bureau website describing the limitation or concept in greater detail in the ACS has been provided.

Additional links to resources for the ACS:

Glossary

American Community Survey (ACS) — The American Community Survey is a large, continuous demographic survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that will provide accurate and up-to-date profiles of America’s communities every year. Annual and multiyear estimates of population and housing data are generated for small areas, including tracts and population subgroups. This information is collected by mailing questionnaires to a sample of addresses. See the U.S. Census Bureau website for additional details.

The Six Disability Questions in the American Community Survey:

  1. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? (yes or no)
  2. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses? (yes or no)
  3. (If person 5 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions? (yes or no)
  4. (If person 5 years or old over) Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? (yes or no)
  5. (If person 5 years old or over) Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? (yes or no)
  6. (If person 15 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? (yes or no)

Average — The sum of all of the values in a sample divided by the number of values in the sample.

Civilian — A person not in active-duty military.

Median — The middlemost value of a sample that separates the upper half of the values from the lower half of the values. 

Non-Institutionalized Population — Describes individuals who are residing in the community and who are not living in institutions such as jails, prisons, nursing homes, hospitals, etc.

Population — The total number of inhabitants in a defined geographic area including all races, classes, and groups.

Prevalence — The proportion of the population with a particular status or condition. Prevalence is usually expressed as a percentage or a number of people per unit of the population.

Prevalence Rate — The prevalence of a particular status or condition estimated over a specific period of time.

Range — The difference between the largest and smallest values in a sample. In a sample, when the smallest value is subtracted from the largest value the resulting value is called the range. 

Sampling Variability — The variation of a statistic when estimated from repeated samples.

United States Census Bureau — An agency within the United States Federal Statistical System tasked with producing data about the American people and economy. Their primary task is to conduct the United States Census every ten years.

About the Center

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the StatsRRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: American Association of People with Disabilities, Center for Essential Management Services, Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and Public Health Institute.

The StatsRRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RTGE00010100, from 2018–2023.

Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (EPM-RRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the EPM-RRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: Association of University Centers on Disability, Hunter College, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and the University of Chicago.

The EPM-RRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RT503701, from 2015–2020.

Contact Information
University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824
Toll-Free Telephone/TTY: 866-538-9521
E-mail: Disability.Statistics@unh.edu
https://www.researchondisability.org