2017 State Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the following individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort: Deb Brucker, Erin Dame, Adam Lavoie, Kate Filanoski, Karen Volle, and Anna Brennan-Curry.

Funding for this publication is made possible by:

The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), grant number 90RTGE0001-01-00; and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement (EPM-RRTC), also funded by NIDILRR, grant number 90RT5037-03-00. The information developed by the StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC does not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government (Edgar, 75.620 (b)).

The StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC are part of the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire. The Institute on Disability/UCED (IOD) was established in 1987 to provide a university-based focus for the improvement of knowledge, policies, and practices related to the lives of people with disabilities and their families and is New Hampshire’s University Center for Excellence in Disability (UCED). Located within the University of New Hampshire, the IOD is a federally designated center authorized by the Developmental Disabilities Act. Through innovative and interdisciplinary research, academic, service, and dissemination initiatives, the IOD builds local, state, and national capacities to respond to the needs of individuals with disabilities and their families.

Institute on Disability / UCED

UNH.png

10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101 | Durham, NH 03284              603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | contact.iod@unh.edu | https://www.iod.unh.edu

Stay Connected:
facebook.png instragram.png linkedin.png Twitter.jpg youtube.png       

 

Copyright 2019. Institute on Disability. University of New Hampshire.      

 

 

 

2017 Tennessee Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on

Disability Statistics and Demographics

A NIDILRR-Funded Center

NIDILIRR.jpg

Introduction

The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence are designed to provide the users of disability statistics with the number of people with disabilities for any given state and county in the United States. This report is intended to be an online complement to Section 1: Population and Prevalence of the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, providing greater detail within each state. The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence can be used to compare county-level statistics between counties in any given state or states.

The following report provides county-level statistics for Tennessee. The proportions of people with disabilities, sometimes called prevalence, presented in the State Reports for County-Level Data is a useful tool for advocates, researchers, and policy-makers to plan and provide services and supports for people with disabilities. In this report, the prevalence of people with disabilities is presented as the number of people with disabilities in a given state and county per total state and county populations, respectively. Counts and percentages are provided in tables and maps.

The data for this report come from the American Community Survey 5-year data. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a national survey developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to provide information on a number of topics about social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the U.S. population. ACS 5-year data is collected over a longer period of time than 1-year data, providing larger sample sizes and increased reliability for less populated areas and small population subgroups. All of the statistics in this report use the ACS 5-year data which includes data from the year of the report and data from the four previous years. In the ACS, people are identified as having a disability based on responses to a series of six questions asking about having difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, and independent living (see glossary for further details).

Specific to Tennessee, the state chosen for this report, sentences providing interpretation and context for prevalence statistics are included below. A short glossary of terms is also provided at the end of the report explaining the statistics that are illustrated in each sentence.

 

 

Additional Resources. The Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and its complement, the Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, are summaries of statistics about people with disabilities, available both in hard copy and online at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org.

Help navigating any of the resources described here can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions section at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org/faq. Assistance interpreting and locating additional statistics is available via our toll-free number, 866.538.9521, or by email, disability.statistics@unh.edu. For more information about our research projects, please visit https://www.researchondisability.org.

Suggested Citation. Boege, S.L., Lauer, E.A., & Houtenville, A.J., 2019. 2017 State Report for Tennessee County-Level Data: Prevalence. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

Interpretation

The following statements are designed to help understand the 2017 county-level statistics from Tennessee that are presented:

  • For the number of people with and without disabilities:
    • The range of total people across Tennessee counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people across Tennessee counties, was 920,324.
      • The county with the greatest number of total people was Shelby (925,195 people).
      • The county with the least number of total people was Lake (4,871 people).
    • The average number of total people across all counties was 68,363.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of total people across Tennessee counties was 30,973.
  • For the number of people with disabilities:
    • The range of people with disabilities across Tennessee counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people with disabilities across Tennessee counties, was 115,570.
      • The county with the greatest number of people with disabilities was Shelby (116,589 people).
      • The county with the least number of people with disabilities was Moore (1,019 people).
    • The average number of people with disabilities across all counties was 10,544.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people with disabilities across Tennessee counties was 5,818.
  • For the percentage of people with disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Tennessee, the overall percentage of people with disabilities is 15.4%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people with disabilities was Hancock (28.8%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people with disabilities was Williamson (7.6%).

 

  • For the number of people without disabilities:
    • The range of people without disabilities across Tennessee counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people without disabilities across Tennessee counties, was 804,952.
      • The county with the greatest number of people without disabilities was Shelby (808,606 people).
      • The county with the least number of people without disabilities was Lake (3,654 people).
    • The average number of people without disabilities across all counties was 57,819.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people without disabilities across Tennessee counties was 24,547.
  • For the percentage of people without disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Tennessee, the overall percentage of people without disabilities is 84.6%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people without disabilities was Williamson (92.4%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people without disabilities was Hancock (71.2%).
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Tennessee, by County: 2017
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
Tennessee  6,494,451 1,001,684 15.4 5,492,767 84.6  Franklin     41,048     8,119 19.8    32,929 80.2
 Anderson     74,641    14,302 19.2    60,339 80.8   Gibson      48,088     8,470 17.6    39,618 82.4
 Bedford      46,458     7,322 15.8    39,136 84.2   Giles       28,614     5,092 17.8    23,522 82.2
  Benton      16,002     4,218 26.4    11,784 73.6  Grainger     22,795     5,048 22.1    17,747 77.9
 Bledsoe      13,234     3,604 27.2     9,630 72.8   Greene      67,319    15,655 23.3    51,664 76.7
  Blount     125,993    19,054 15.1   106,939 84.9   Grundy      13,179     3,430 26.0     9,749 74.0
 Bradley     102,666    18,327 17.9    84,339 82.1  Hamblen      62,687    11,667 18.6    51,020 81.4
 Campbell     39,285     9,473 24.1    29,812 75.9  Hamilton    350,600    48,821 13.9   301,779 86.1
  Cannon      13,653     2,621 19.2    11,032 80.8  Hancock       6,440     1,852 28.8     4,588 71.2
 Carroll      27,646     5,818 21.0    21,828 79.0  Hardeman     22,096     4,252 19.2    17,844 80.8
  Carter      55,450    11,908 21.5    43,542 78.5   Hardin      25,398     4,690 18.5    20,708 81.5
 Cheatham     39,386     5,686 14.4    33,700 85.6  Hawkins      55,776    12,566 22.5    43,210 77.5
 Chester      16,966     2,163 12.7    14,803 87.3  Haywood      17,708     3,227 18.2    14,481 81.8
Claiborne     30,973     6,426 20.7    24,547 79.3 Henderson     27,562     4,839 17.6    22,723 82.4
   Clay        7,591     1,544 20.3     6,047 79.7   Henry       31,806     6,951 21.9    24,855 78.1
  Cocke       34,979     7,969 22.8    27,010 77.2  Hickman      22,982     4,707 20.5    18,275 79.5
  Coffee      53,471     9,780 18.3    43,691 81.7  Houston       7,983     1,783 22.3     6,200 77.7
 Crockett     14,342     2,831 19.7    11,511 80.3 Humphreys     18,064     3,802 21.0    14,262 79.0
Cumberland    57,531    13,154 22.9    44,377 77.1  Jackson      11,388     2,532 22.2     8,856 77.8
 Davidson    671,589    79,390 11.8   592,199 88.2 Jefferson     51,964    10,354 19.9    41,610 80.1
  DeKalb      19,143     3,225 16.8    15,918 83.2  Johnson      15,947     3,689 23.1    12,258 76.9
 Decatur      11,444     2,528 22.1     8,916 77.9    Knox      448,739    57,797 12.9   390,942 87.1
 Dickson      50,838     8,452 16.6    42,386 83.4    Lake        4,871     1,217 25.0     3,654 75.0
   Dyer       37,227     7,232 19.4    29,995 80.6 Lauderdale    23,619     5,361 22.7    18,258 77.3
 Fayette      38,844     5,923 15.2    32,921 84.8  Lawrence     42,143     7,636 18.1    34,507 81.9
 Fentress     17,709     4,167 23.5    13,542 76.5   Lewis       11,725     2,126 18.1     9,599 81.9
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Tennessee, by County: 2017
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
 Lincoln      33,191     6,610 19.9    26,581 80.1   Sevier      94,605    16,585 17.5    78,020 82.5
  Loudon      50,654     7,858 15.5    42,796 84.5   Shelby     925,195   116,589 12.6   808,606 87.4
  Macon       22,892     4,439 19.4    18,453 80.6   Smith       19,058     3,435 18.0    15,623 82.0
 Madison      96,630    14,899 15.4    81,731 84.6  Stewart      13,023     2,649 20.3    10,374 79.7
  Marion      27,992     5,673 20.3    22,319 79.7  Sullivan    154,897    31,804 20.5   123,093 79.5
 Marshall     31,417     5,206 16.6    26,211 83.4   Sumner     174,148    23,306 13.4   150,842 86.6
  Maury       86,444    12,592 14.6    73,852 85.4   Tipton      60,611     9,785 16.1    50,826 83.9
  McMinn      51,800     9,732 18.8    42,068 81.2 Trousdale      8,684     1,742 20.1     6,942 79.9
 McNairy      25,601     4,862 19.0    20,739 81.0   Unicoi      17,481     4,163 23.8    13,318 76.2
  Meigs       11,708     2,424 20.7     9,284 79.3   Union       19,008     3,330 17.5    15,678 82.5
  Monroe      45,185     8,725 19.3    36,460 80.7 Van Buren      5,573     1,302 23.4     4,271 76.6
Montgomery   178,128    26,042 14.6   152,086 85.4   Warren      39,705     7,808 19.7    31,897 80.3
  Moore        6,195     1,019 16.4     5,176 83.6 Washington   124,652    22,202 17.8   102,450 82.2
  Morgan      18,782     4,356 23.2    14,426 76.8   Wayne       14,687     2,931 20.0    11,756 80.0
  Obion       30,243     5,899 19.5    24,344 80.5  Weakley      33,341     6,058 18.2    27,283 81.8
 Overton      21,715     3,358 15.5    18,357 84.5   White       25,982     5,332 20.5    20,650 79.5
  Perry        7,736     1,587 20.5     6,149 79.5 Williamson   211,662    16,054  7.6   195,608 92.4
 Pickett       4,983     1,027 20.6     3,956 79.4   Wilson     127,842    16,520 12.9   111,322 87.1
   Polk       16,488     2,954 17.9    13,534 82.1                                                   
  Putnam      74,695    10,467 14.0    64,228 86.0                                                   
   Rhea       32,102     7,060 22.0    25,042 78.0                                                   
  Roane       52,261    11,001 21.1    41,260 78.9                                                   
Robertson     67,688     9,897 14.6    57,791 85.4                                                   
Rutherford   296,123    30,864 10.4   265,259 89.6                                                   
  Scott       21,619     5,571 25.8    16,048 74.2                                                   
Sequatchie    14,423     3,167 22.0    11,256 78.0                                                   
Count of People with Disabilities for Tennessee, by County: 2017

Percentage of People with Disabilities for Tennessee, by County: 2017

Discussion

There are a number of concepts and factors which complicate the interpretation of the estimates presented in this report. These concerns affect all statistics from population-based surveys. The estimates included in this document should be interpreted the following limitations in mind and generalized with caution. In each point, a link to the U.S. Census Bureau website describing the limitation or concept in greater detail in the ACS has been provided.

Additional links to resources for the ACS:

Glossary

American Community Survey (ACS) — The American Community Survey is a large, continuous demographic survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that will provide accurate and up-to-date profiles of America’s communities every year. Annual and multiyear estimates of population and housing data are generated for small areas, including tracts and population subgroups. This information is collected by mailing questionnaires to a sample of addresses. See the U.S. Census Bureau website for additional details.

The Six Disability Questions in the American Community Survey:

  1. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? (yes or no)
  2. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses? (yes or no)
  3. (If person 5 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions? (yes or no)
  4. (If person 5 years or old over) Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? (yes or no)
  5. (If person 5 years old or over) Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? (yes or no)
  6. (If person 15 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? (yes or no)

Average — The sum of all of the values in a sample divided by the number of values in the sample.

Civilian — A person not in active-duty military.

Median — The middlemost value of a sample that separates the upper half of the values from the lower half of the values. 

Non-Institutionalized Population — Describes individuals who are residing in the community and who are not living in institutions such as jails, prisons, nursing homes, hospitals, etc.

Population — The total number of inhabitants in a defined geographic area including all races, classes, and groups.

Prevalence — The proportion of the population with a particular status or condition. Prevalence is usually expressed as a percentage or a number of people per unit of the population.

Prevalence Rate — The prevalence of a particular status or condition estimated over a specific period of time.

Range — The difference between the largest and smallest values in a sample. In a sample, when the smallest value is subtracted from the largest value the resulting value is called the range. 

Sampling Variability — The variation of a statistic when estimated from repeated samples.

United States Census Bureau — An agency within the United States Federal Statistical System tasked with producing data about the American people and economy. Their primary task is to conduct the United States Census every ten years.

About the Center

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the StatsRRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: American Association of People with Disabilities, Center for Essential Management Services, Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and Public Health Institute.

The StatsRRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RTGE00010100, from 2018–2023.

Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (EPM-RRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the EPM-RRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: Association of University Centers on Disability, Hunter College, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and the University of Chicago.

The EPM-RRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RT503701, from 2015–2020.

Contact Information
University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824
Toll-Free Telephone/TTY: 866-538-9521
E-mail: Disability.Statistics@unh.edu
https://www.researchondisability.org