2018 State Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the following individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort: Deb Brucker, Erin Dame, Kate Filanoski, Adam Lavoie, Kim Phillips, and Karen Volle.

Funding for this publication is made possible by:

The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), grant number 90RTGE0001-01-00; and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement (EPM-RRTC), also funded by NIDILRR, grant number 90RT5037-03-00. The information developed by the StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC does not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government (Edgar, 75.620 (b)).

The StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC are part of the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire. The Institute on Disability/UCED (IOD) was established in 1987 to provide a university-based focus for the improvement of knowledge, policies, and practices related to the lives of people with disabilities and their families and is New Hampshire’s University Center for Excellence in Disability (UCED). Located within the University of New Hampshire, the IOD is a federally designated center authorized by the Developmental Disabilities Act. Through innovative and interdisciplinary research, academic, service, and dissemination initiatives, the IOD builds local, state, and national capacities to respond to the needs of individuals with disabilities and their families.

Institute on Disability / UCED

UNH.png

10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101 | Durham, NH 03284              603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | contact.iod@unh.edu | https://www.iod.unh.edu

Stay Connected:
facebook.png instragram.png linkedin.png Twitter.jpg youtube.png       

 

Copyright 2020. Institute on Disability. University of New Hampshire.      

 

 

 

2018 Montana Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on

Disability Statistics and Demographics

A NIDILRR-Funded Center

NIDILIRR.jpg

Introduction

The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence are designed to provide the users of disability statistics with the number of people with disabilities for any given state and county in the United States. This report is intended to be an online complement to Section 1: Population and Prevalence of the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, providing greater detail within each state. The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence can be used to compare county-level statistics between counties in any given state or states.

The following report provides county-level statistics for Montana. The proportions of people with disabilities, sometimes called prevalence, presented in the State Reports for County-Level Data is a useful tool for advocates, researchers, and policy-makers to plan and provide services and supports for people with disabilities. In this report, the prevalence of people with disabilities is presented as the number of people with disabilities in a given state and county per total state and county populations, respectively. Counts and percentages are provided in tables and maps.

The data for this report come from the American Community Survey 5-year data. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a national survey developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to provide information on a number of topics about social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the U.S. population. ACS 5-year data is collected over a longer period of time than 1-year data, providing larger sample sizes and increased reliability for less populated areas and small population subgroups. All of the statistics in this report use the ACS 5-year data which includes data from the year of the report and data from the four previous years. In the ACS, people are identified as having a disability based on responses to a series of six questions asking about having difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, and independent living (see glossary for further details).

Specific to Montana, the state chosen for this report, sentences providing interpretation and context for prevalence statistics are included below. A short glossary of terms is also provided at the end of the report explaining the statistics that are illustrated in each sentence.

 

 

Additional Resources. The Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and its complement, the Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, are summaries of statistics about people with disabilities, available both in hard copy and online at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org.

Help navigating any of the resources described here can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions section at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org/faq. Assistance interpreting and locating additional statistics is available via our toll-free number, 866.538.9521, or by email, disability.statistics@unh.edu. For more information about our research projects, please visit https://www.researchondisability.org.

Suggested Citation. Boege, S.L., Lauer, E.A., & Houtenville, A.J., 2020. 2018 State Report for Montana County-Level Data: Prevalence. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

Interpretation

The following statements are designed to help understand the 2018 county-level statistics from Montana that are presented:

  • For the number of people with and without disabilities:
    • The range of total people across Montana counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people across Montana counties, was 155,156.
      • The county with the greatest number of total people was Yellowstone (155,588 people).
      • The county with the least number of total people was Petroleum (432 people).
    • The average number of total people across all counties was 18,332.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of total people across Montana counties was 7,018.
  • For the number of people with disabilities:
    • The range of people with disabilities across Montana counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people with disabilities across Montana counties, was 19,177.
      • The county with the greatest number of people with disabilities was Yellowstone (19,235 people).
      • The county with the least number of people with disabilities was Petroleum (58 people).
    • The average number of people with disabilities across all counties was 2,493.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people with disabilities across Montana counties was 1,129.
  • For the percentage of people with disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Montana, the overall percentage of people with disabilities is 13.6%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people with disabilities was Deer Lodge (24.1%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people with disabilities was Gallatin (7.9%).

 

  • For the number of people without disabilities:
    • The range of people without disabilities across Montana counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people without disabilities across Montana counties, was 135,979.
      • The county with the greatest number of people without disabilities was Yellowstone (136,353 people).
      • The county with the least number of people without disabilities was Petroleum (374 people).
    • The average number of people without disabilities across all counties was 15,838.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people without disabilities across Montana counties was 5,761.
  • For the percentage of people without disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Montana, the overall percentage of people without disabilities is 86.4%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people without disabilities was Gallatin (92.1%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people without disabilities was Deer Lodge (75.9%).
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Montana, by County: 2018
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
    Montana     1,026,586 139,635 13.6 886,951 86.4     Liberty         2,258     388 17.2   1,870 82.8
  Beaverhead        9,262   1,429 15.4   7,833 84.6     Lincoln        19,178   4,096 21.4  15,082 78.6
   Big Horn        13,258   1,178  8.9  12,080 91.1     Madison         8,160   1,176 14.4   6,984 85.6
    Blaine          6,621   1,403 21.2   5,218 78.8     McCone          1,609     206 12.8   1,403 87.2
  Broadwater        5,791   1,047 18.1   4,744 81.9     Meagher         1,942     291 15.0   1,651 85.0
    Carbon         10,442   1,662 15.9   8,780 84.1     Mineral         4,128     960 23.3   3,168 76.7
    Carter          1,296     176 13.6   1,120 86.4    Missoula       115,362  14,773 12.8 100,589 87.2
    Cascade        78,238  11,634 14.9  66,604 85.1   Musselshell       4,774     705 14.8   4,069 85.2
   Chouteau         5,732     662 11.5   5,070 88.5      Park          16,144   1,790 11.1  14,354 88.9
    Custer         11,629   2,143 18.4   9,486 81.6    Petroleum          432      58 13.4     374 86.6
    Daniels         1,728     270 15.6   1,458 84.4    Phillips         4,083     679 16.6   3,404 83.4
    Dawson          8,880   1,147 12.9   7,733 87.1     Pondera         5,974   1,020 17.1   4,954 82.9
  Deer Lodge        8,518   2,051 24.1   6,467 75.9  Powder River       1,589     263 16.6   1,326 83.4
    Fallon          2,762     348 12.6   2,414 87.4     Powell          5,260     786 14.9   4,474 85.1
    Fergus         11,096   1,361 12.3   9,735 87.7     Prairie         1,324     212 16.0   1,112 84.0
   Flathead        97,486  11,163 11.5  86,323 88.5     Ravalli        41,711   8,259 19.8  33,452 80.2
   Gallatin       104,353   8,237  7.9  96,116 92.1    Richland        11,360   1,464 12.9   9,896 87.1
   Garfield         1,141     120 10.5   1,021 89.5    Roosevelt       11,000   1,319 12.0   9,681 88.0
    Glacier        13,573   1,537 11.3  12,036 88.7     Rosebud         9,169   1,684 18.4   7,485 81.6
 Golden Valley        724     114 15.7     610 84.3     Sanders        11,397   2,254 19.8   9,143 80.2
    Granite         3,237     609 18.8   2,628 81.2    Sheridan         3,529     455 12.9   3,074 87.1
     Hill          16,315   2,535 15.5  13,780 84.5   Silver Bow       34,218   6,384 18.7  27,834 81.3
   Jefferson       11,591   1,509 13.0  10,082 87.0   Stillwater        9,362   1,236 13.2   8,126 86.8
 Judith Basin       1,951     282 14.5   1,669 85.5   Sweet Grass       3,632     491 13.5   3,141 86.5
     Lake          29,592   4,251 14.4  25,341 85.6      Teton          6,005     931 15.5   5,074 84.5
Lewis and Clark    66,387   9,217 13.9  57,170 86.1      Toole          4,339     795 18.3   3,544 81.7
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Montana, by County: 2018
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
   Treasure           777     121 15.6     656 84.4                                                    
    Valley          7,414   1,110 15.0   6,304 85.0                                                    
   Wheatland        2,116     257 12.1   1,859 87.9                                                    
    Wibaux          1,149     152 13.2     997 86.8                                                    
  Yellowstone     155,588  19,235 12.4 136,353 87.6                                                    
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
Count of People with Disabilities for Montana, by County: 2018

Percentage of People with Disabilities for Montana, by County: 2018

Discussion

There are a number of concepts and factors which complicate the interpretation of the estimates presented in this report. These concerns affect all statistics from population-based surveys. The estimates included in this document should be interpreted the following limitations in mind and generalized with caution. In each point, a link to the U.S. Census Bureau website describing the limitation or concept in greater detail in the ACS has been provided.

Additional links to resources for the ACS:

Glossary

American Community Survey (ACS) — The American Community Survey is a large, continuous demographic survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that will provide accurate and up-to-date profiles of America’s communities every year. Annual and multiyear estimates of population and housing data are generated for small areas, including tracts and population subgroups. This information is collected by mailing questionnaires to a sample of addresses. See the U.S. Census Bureau website for additional details.

The Six Disability Questions in the American Community Survey:

  1. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? (yes or no)
  2. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses? (yes or no)
  3. (If person 5 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions? (yes or no)
  4. (If person 5 years or old over) Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? (yes or no)
  5. (If person 5 years old or over) Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? (yes or no)
  6. (If person 15 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? (yes or no)

Average — The sum of all of the values in a sample divided by the number of values in the sample.

Civilian — A person not in active-duty military.

Median — The middlemost value of a sample that separates the upper half of the values from the lower half of the values. 

Non-Institutionalized Population — Describes individuals who are residing in the community and who are not living in institutions such as jails, prisons, nursing homes, hospitals, etc.

Population — The total number of inhabitants in a defined geographic area including all races, classes, and groups.

 

 

Prevalence — The proportion of the population with a particular status or condition. Prevalence is usually expressed as a percentage or a number of people per unit of the population.

Prevalence Rate — The prevalence of a particular status or condition estimated over a specific period of time.

Range — The difference between the largest and smallest values in a sample. In a sample, when the smallest value is subtracted from the largest value the resulting value is called the range. 

Sampling Variability — The variation of a statistic when estimated from repeated samples.

United States Census Bureau — An agency within the United States Federal Statistical System tasked with producing data about the American people and economy. Their primary task is to conduct the United States Census every ten years.

About the Center

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the StatsRRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: American Association of People with Disabilities, Center for Essential Management Services, Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and Public Health Institute.

The StatsRRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RTGE00010100, from 2018–2023.

Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (EPM-RRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the EPM-RRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: Association of University Centers on Disability, Hunter College, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and the University of Chicago.

The EPM-RRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RT503701, from 2015–2020.

Contact Information
University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824
Toll-Free Telephone/TTY: 866-538-9521
E-mail: Disability.Statistics@unh.edu
https://www.researchondisability.org