2018 State Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the following individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort: Deb Brucker, Erin Dame, Kate Filanoski, Adam Lavoie, Kim Phillips, and Karen Volle.

Funding for this publication is made possible by:

The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), grant number 90RTGE0001-01-00; and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement (EPM-RRTC), also funded by NIDILRR, grant number 90RT5037-03-00. The information developed by the StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC does not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government (Edgar, 75.620 (b)).

The StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC are part of the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire. The Institute on Disability/UCED (IOD) was established in 1987 to provide a university-based focus for the improvement of knowledge, policies, and practices related to the lives of people with disabilities and their families and is New Hampshire’s University Center for Excellence in Disability (UCED). Located within the University of New Hampshire, the IOD is a federally designated center authorized by the Developmental Disabilities Act. Through innovative and interdisciplinary research, academic, service, and dissemination initiatives, the IOD builds local, state, and national capacities to respond to the needs of individuals with disabilities and their families.

Institute on Disability / UCED

UNH.png

10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101 | Durham, NH 03284              603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | contact.iod@unh.edu | https://www.iod.unh.edu

Stay Connected:
facebook.png instragram.png linkedin.png Twitter.jpg youtube.png       

 

Copyright 2020. Institute on Disability. University of New Hampshire.      

 

 

 

2018 Ohio Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on

Disability Statistics and Demographics

A NIDILRR-Funded Center

NIDILIRR.jpg

Introduction

The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence are designed to provide the users of disability statistics with the number of people with disabilities for any given state and county in the United States. This report is intended to be an online complement to Section 1: Population and Prevalence of the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, providing greater detail within each state. The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence can be used to compare county-level statistics between counties in any given state or states.

The following report provides county-level statistics for Ohio. The proportions of people with disabilities, sometimes called prevalence, presented in the State Reports for County-Level Data is a useful tool for advocates, researchers, and policy-makers to plan and provide services and supports for people with disabilities. In this report, the prevalence of people with disabilities is presented as the number of people with disabilities in a given state and county per total state and county populations, respectively. Counts and percentages are provided in tables and maps.

The data for this report come from the American Community Survey 5-year data. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a national survey developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to provide information on a number of topics about social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the U.S. population. ACS 5-year data is collected over a longer period of time than 1-year data, providing larger sample sizes and increased reliability for less populated areas and small population subgroups. All of the statistics in this report use the ACS 5-year data which includes data from the year of the report and data from the four previous years. In the ACS, people are identified as having a disability based on responses to a series of six questions asking about having difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, and independent living (see glossary for further details).

Specific to Ohio, the state chosen for this report, sentences providing interpretation and context for prevalence statistics are included below. A short glossary of terms is also provided at the end of the report explaining the statistics that are illustrated in each sentence.

 

 

Additional Resources. The Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and its complement, the Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, are summaries of statistics about people with disabilities, available both in hard copy and online at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org.

Help navigating any of the resources described here can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions section at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org/faq. Assistance interpreting and locating additional statistics is available via our toll-free number, 866.538.9521, or by email, disability.statistics@unh.edu. For more information about our research projects, please visit https://www.researchondisability.org.

Suggested Citation. Boege, S.L., Lauer, E.A., & Houtenville, A.J., 2020. 2018 State Report for Ohio County-Level Data: Prevalence. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

Interpretation

The following statements are designed to help understand the 2018 county-level statistics from Ohio that are presented:

  • For the number of people with and without disabilities:
    • The range of total people across Ohio counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people across Ohio counties, was 1,255,378.
      • The county with the greatest number of total people was Franklin (1,267,350 people).
      • The county with the least number of total people was Noble (11,972 people).
    • The average number of total people across all counties was 130,326.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of total people across Ohio counties was 56,230.
  • For the number of people with disabilities:
    • The range of people with disabilities across Ohio counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people with disabilities across Ohio counties, was 184,332.
      • The county with the greatest number of people with disabilities was Cuyahoga (186,767 people).
      • The county with the least number of people with disabilities was Noble (2,435 people).
    • The average number of people with disabilities across all counties was 18,198.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people with disabilities across Ohio counties was 7,995.
  • For the percentage of people with disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Ohio, the overall percentage of people with disabilities is 14.0%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people with disabilities was Pike (24.1%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people with disabilities was Delaware (7.9%).

 

  • For the number of people without disabilities:
    • The range of people without disabilities across Ohio counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people without disabilities across Ohio counties, was 1,115,325.
      • The county with the greatest number of people without disabilities was Franklin (1,124,862 people).
      • The county with the least number of people without disabilities was Noble (9,537 people).
    • The average number of people without disabilities across all counties was 112,128.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people without disabilities across Ohio counties was 46,483.
  • For the percentage of people without disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Ohio, the overall percentage of people without disabilities is 86.0%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people without disabilities was Delaware (92.1%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people without disabilities was Pike (75.9%).
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Ohio, by County: 2018
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
   Ohio    11,468,700 1,601,403 14.0 9,867,297 86.0   Fulton       41,907     5,644 13.5    36,263 86.5
  Adams        27,601     5,580 20.2    22,021 79.8   Gallia       29,810     6,203 20.8    23,607 79.2
  Allen       101,212    15,701 15.5    85,511 84.5   Geauga       93,233     9,889 10.6    83,344 89.4
 Ashland       52,854     7,352 13.9    45,502 86.1   Greene      161,844    20,911 12.9   140,933 87.1
Ashtabula      95,162    15,601 16.4    79,561 83.6  Guernsey      38,803     6,874 17.7    31,929 82.3
  Athens       65,238    10,810 16.6    54,428 83.4  Hamilton     804,004    99,713 12.4   704,291 87.6
 Auglaize      45,251     4,915 10.9    40,336 89.1  Hancock       74,840     8,424 11.3    66,416 88.7
 Belmont       64,634    10,462 16.2    54,172 83.8   Hardin       31,357     4,558 14.5    26,799 85.5
  Brown        43,124     7,108 16.5    36,016 83.5  Harrison      15,045     2,820 18.7    12,225 81.3
  Butler      374,831    46,200 12.3   328,631 87.7   Henry        26,889     3,546 13.2    23,343 86.8
 Carroll       27,293     4,019 14.7    23,274 85.3  Highland      42,567     7,872 18.5    34,695 81.5
Champaign      38,385     6,170 16.1    32,215 83.9  Hocking       27,852     4,907 17.6    22,945 82.4
  Clark       133,440    22,560 16.9   110,880 83.1   Holmes       43,042     3,481  8.1    39,561 91.9
 Clermont     201,904    27,142 13.4   174,762 86.6   Huron        57,919     7,960 13.7    49,959 86.3
 Clinton       41,568     6,647 16.0    34,921 84.0  Jackson       32,188     5,965 18.5    26,223 81.5
Columbiana    100,407    16,240 16.2    84,167 83.8 Jefferson      66,141    12,022 18.2    54,119 81.8
Coshocton      36,166     5,674 15.7    30,492 84.3    Knox        60,574     7,939 13.1    52,635 86.9
 Crawford      41,449     6,974 16.8    34,475 83.2    Lake       227,982    29,673 13.0   198,309 87.0
 Cuyahoga   1,238,780   186,767 15.1 1,052,013 84.9  Lawrence      60,042    13,655 22.7    46,387 77.3
  Darke        51,110     7,146 14.0    43,964 86.0  Licking      170,961    26,245 15.4   144,716 84.6
 Defiance      37,984     4,857 12.8    33,127 87.2   Logan        44,922     6,175 13.7    38,747 86.3
 Delaware     196,084    15,539  7.9   180,545 92.1   Lorain      300,305    45,673 15.2   254,632 84.8
   Erie        74,195    11,014 14.8    63,181 85.2   Lucas       427,387    65,360 15.3   362,027 84.7
Fairfield     150,076    20,591 13.7   129,485 86.3  Madison       39,068     5,992 15.3    33,076 84.7
 Fayette       28,257     4,709 16.7    23,548 83.3  Mahoning     226,551    34,564 15.3   191,987 84.7
 Franklin   1,267,350   142,488 11.2 1,124,862 88.8   Marion       59,873    11,602 19.4    48,271 80.6
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Ohio, by County: 2018
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
  Medina      176,076    19,193 10.9   156,883 89.1  Trumbull     198,233    29,367 14.8   168,866 85.2
  Meigs        22,954     5,320 23.2    17,634 76.8 Tuscarawas     91,577    13,051 14.3    78,526 85.7
  Mercer       40,406     4,684 11.6    35,722 88.4   Union        52,468     6,014 11.5    46,454 88.5
  Miami       103,851    14,489 14.0    89,362 86.0  Van Wert      28,009     4,013 14.3    23,996 85.7
  Monroe       13,949     3,002 21.5    10,947 78.5   Vinton       13,033     2,817 21.6    10,216 78.4
Montgomery    523,759    79,697 15.2   444,062 84.8   Warren      219,225    21,415  9.8   197,810 90.2
  Morgan       14,516     3,204 22.1    11,312 77.9 Washington     59,959    12,237 20.4    47,722 79.6
  Morrow       34,725     5,104 14.7    29,621 85.3   Wayne       115,073    13,937 12.1   101,136 87.9
Muskingum      85,251    14,429 16.9    70,822 83.1  Williams      35,763     5,396 15.1    30,367 84.9
  Noble        11,972     2,435 20.3     9,537 79.7    Wood       128,595    14,624 11.4   113,971 88.6
  Ottawa       40,272     6,327 15.7    33,945 84.3  Wyandot       21,844     3,005 13.8    18,839 86.2
 Paulding      18,768     3,315 17.7    15,453 82.3                                                    
  Perry        35,744     6,170 17.3    29,574 82.7                                                    
 Pickaway      52,972     8,160 15.4    44,812 84.6                                                    
   Pike        27,909     6,725 24.1    21,184 75.9                                                    
 Portage      161,569    21,556 13.3   140,013 86.7                                                    
  Preble       40,877     6,717 16.4    34,160 83.6                                                    
  Putnam       33,707     3,450 10.2    30,257 89.8                                                    
 Richland     114,683    18,516 16.1    96,167 83.9                                                    
   Ross        71,337    14,722 20.6    56,615 79.4                                                    
 Sandusky      58,404     9,034 15.5    49,370 84.5                                                    
  Scioto       73,577    16,394 22.3    57,183 77.7                                                    
  Seneca       54,541     8,030 14.7    46,511 85.3                                                    
  Shelby       48,488     6,211 12.8    42,277 87.2                                                    
  Stark       368,713    49,462 13.4   319,251 86.6                                                    
  Summit      536,440    69,248 12.9   467,192 87.1                                                    
Count of People with Disabilities for Ohio, by County: 2018

Percentage of People with Disabilities for Ohio, by County: 2018

Discussion

There are a number of concepts and factors which complicate the interpretation of the estimates presented in this report. These concerns affect all statistics from population-based surveys. The estimates included in this document should be interpreted the following limitations in mind and generalized with caution. In each point, a link to the U.S. Census Bureau website describing the limitation or concept in greater detail in the ACS has been provided.

Additional links to resources for the ACS:

Glossary

American Community Survey (ACS) — The American Community Survey is a large, continuous demographic survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that will provide accurate and up-to-date profiles of America’s communities every year. Annual and multiyear estimates of population and housing data are generated for small areas, including tracts and population subgroups. This information is collected by mailing questionnaires to a sample of addresses. See the U.S. Census Bureau website for additional details.

The Six Disability Questions in the American Community Survey:

  1. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? (yes or no)
  2. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses? (yes or no)
  3. (If person 5 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions? (yes or no)
  4. (If person 5 years or old over) Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? (yes or no)
  5. (If person 5 years old or over) Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? (yes or no)
  6. (If person 15 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? (yes or no)

Average — The sum of all of the values in a sample divided by the number of values in the sample.

Civilian — A person not in active-duty military.

Median — The middlemost value of a sample that separates the upper half of the values from the lower half of the values. 

Non-Institutionalized Population — Describes individuals who are residing in the community and who are not living in institutions such as jails, prisons, nursing homes, hospitals, etc.

Population — The total number of inhabitants in a defined geographic area including all races, classes, and groups.

 

 

Prevalence — The proportion of the population with a particular status or condition. Prevalence is usually expressed as a percentage or a number of people per unit of the population.

Prevalence Rate — The prevalence of a particular status or condition estimated over a specific period of time.

Range — The difference between the largest and smallest values in a sample. In a sample, when the smallest value is subtracted from the largest value the resulting value is called the range. 

Sampling Variability — The variation of a statistic when estimated from repeated samples.

United States Census Bureau — An agency within the United States Federal Statistical System tasked with producing data about the American people and economy. Their primary task is to conduct the United States Census every ten years.

About the Center

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the StatsRRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: American Association of People with Disabilities, Center for Essential Management Services, Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and Public Health Institute.

The StatsRRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RTGE00010100, from 2018–2023.

Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (EPM-RRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the EPM-RRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: Association of University Centers on Disability, Hunter College, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and the University of Chicago.

The EPM-RRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RT503701, from 2015–2020.

Contact Information
University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824
Toll-Free Telephone/TTY: 866-538-9521
E-mail: Disability.Statistics@unh.edu
https://www.researchondisability.org