2018 State Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the following individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort: Deb Brucker, Erin Dame, Kate Filanoski, Adam Lavoie, Kim Phillips, and Karen Volle.

Funding for this publication is made possible by:

The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), grant number 90RTGE0001-01-00; and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement (EPM-RRTC), also funded by NIDILRR, grant number 90RT5037-03-00. The information developed by the StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC does not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government (Edgar, 75.620 (b)).

The StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC are part of the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire. The Institute on Disability/UCED (IOD) was established in 1987 to provide a university-based focus for the improvement of knowledge, policies, and practices related to the lives of people with disabilities and their families and is New Hampshire’s University Center for Excellence in Disability (UCED). Located within the University of New Hampshire, the IOD is a federally designated center authorized by the Developmental Disabilities Act. Through innovative and interdisciplinary research, academic, service, and dissemination initiatives, the IOD builds local, state, and national capacities to respond to the needs of individuals with disabilities and their families.

Institute on Disability / UCED

UNH.png

10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101 | Durham, NH 03284              603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | contact.iod@unh.edu | https://www.iod.unh.edu

Stay Connected:
facebook.png instragram.png linkedin.png Twitter.jpg youtube.png       

 

Copyright 2020. Institute on Disability. University of New Hampshire.      

 

 

 

2018 Oklahoma Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on

Disability Statistics and Demographics

A NIDILRR-Funded Center

NIDILIRR.jpg

Introduction

The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence are designed to provide the users of disability statistics with the number of people with disabilities for any given state and county in the United States. This report is intended to be an online complement to Section 1: Population and Prevalence of the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, providing greater detail within each state. The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence can be used to compare county-level statistics between counties in any given state or states.

The following report provides county-level statistics for Oklahoma. The proportions of people with disabilities, sometimes called prevalence, presented in the State Reports for County-Level Data is a useful tool for advocates, researchers, and policy-makers to plan and provide services and supports for people with disabilities. In this report, the prevalence of people with disabilities is presented as the number of people with disabilities in a given state and county per total state and county populations, respectively. Counts and percentages are provided in tables and maps.

The data for this report come from the American Community Survey 5-year data. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a national survey developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to provide information on a number of topics about social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the U.S. population. ACS 5-year data is collected over a longer period of time than 1-year data, providing larger sample sizes and increased reliability for less populated areas and small population subgroups. All of the statistics in this report use the ACS 5-year data which includes data from the year of the report and data from the four previous years. In the ACS, people are identified as having a disability based on responses to a series of six questions asking about having difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, and independent living (see glossary for further details).

Specific to Oklahoma, the state chosen for this report, sentences providing interpretation and context for prevalence statistics are included below. A short glossary of terms is also provided at the end of the report explaining the statistics that are illustrated in each sentence.

 

 

Additional Resources. The Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and its complement, the Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, are summaries of statistics about people with disabilities, available both in hard copy and online at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org.

Help navigating any of the resources described here can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions section at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org/faq. Assistance interpreting and locating additional statistics is available via our toll-free number, 866.538.9521, or by email, disability.statistics@unh.edu. For more information about our research projects, please visit https://www.researchondisability.org.

Suggested Citation. Boege, S.L., Lauer, E.A., & Houtenville, A.J., 2020. 2018 State Report for Oklahoma County-Level Data: Prevalence. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

Interpretation

The following statements are designed to help understand the 2018 county-level statistics from Oklahoma that are presented:

  • For the number of people with and without disabilities:
    • The range of total people across Oklahoma counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people across Oklahoma counties, was 767,390.
      • The county with the greatest number of total people was Oklahoma (769,559 people).
      • The county with the least number of total people was Cimarron (2,169 people).
    • The average number of total people across all counties was 49,839.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of total people across Oklahoma counties was 20,998.
  • For the number of people with disabilities:
    • The range of people with disabilities across Oklahoma counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people with disabilities across Oklahoma counties, was 104,710.
      • The county with the greatest number of people with disabilities was Oklahoma (105,033 people).
      • The county with the least number of people with disabilities was Cimarron (323 people).
    • The average number of people with disabilities across all counties was 7,967.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people with disabilities across Oklahoma counties was 4,008.
  • For the percentage of people with disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Oklahoma, the overall percentage of people with disabilities is 16.0%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people with disabilities was Marshall (28.6%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people with disabilities was Texas (7.6%).

 

  • For the number of people without disabilities:
    • The range of people without disabilities across Oklahoma counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people without disabilities across Oklahoma counties, was 662,680.
      • The county with the greatest number of people without disabilities was Oklahoma (664,526 people).
      • The county with the least number of people without disabilities was Cimarron (1,846 people).
    • The average number of people without disabilities across all counties was 41,872.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people without disabilities across Oklahoma counties was 17,782.
  • For the percentage of people without disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Oklahoma, the overall percentage of people without disabilities is 84.0%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people without disabilities was Texas (92.4%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people without disabilities was Marshall (71.4%).
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Oklahoma, by County: 2018
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
  Oklahoma   3,837,568 613,429 16.0 3,224,139 84.0    Grady        54,215   9,180 16.9    45,035 83.1
   Adair        21,980   4,198 19.1    17,782 80.9    Grant         4,322     824 19.1     3,498 80.9
  Alfalfa        4,769     804 16.9     3,965 83.1    Greer         4,911   1,112 22.6     3,799 77.4
   Atoka        12,332   2,764 22.4     9,568 77.6    Harmon        2,617     522 19.9     2,095 80.1
   Beaver        5,332     556 10.4     4,776 89.6    Harper        3,821     508 13.3     3,313 86.7
  Beckham       20,823   3,157 15.2    17,666 84.8   Haskell       12,645   3,184 25.2     9,461 74.8
   Blaine        8,182   1,620 19.8     6,562 80.2    Hughes       11,923   2,548 21.4     9,375 78.6
   Bryan        45,305   9,683 21.4    35,622 78.6   Jackson       23,936   4,008 16.7    19,928 83.3
   Caddo        28,199   5,965 21.2    22,234 78.8  Jefferson       6,075   1,464 24.1     4,611 75.9
  Canadian     134,839  17,896 13.3   116,943 86.7   Johnston      10,920   2,572 23.6     8,348 76.4
   Carter       47,761   8,991 18.8    38,770 81.2     Kay         44,207   8,977 20.3    35,230 79.7
  Cherokee      48,204   8,378 17.4    39,826 82.6  Kingfisher     15,452   2,370 15.3    13,082 84.7
  Choctaw       14,707   3,233 22.0    11,474 78.0    Kiowa         8,811   1,885 21.4     6,926 78.6
  Cimarron       2,169     323 14.9     1,846 85.1   Latimer       10,287   2,468 24.0     7,819 76.0
 Cleveland     271,023  36,177 13.3   234,846 86.7   Le Flore      48,757  10,963 22.5    37,794 77.5
    Coal         5,549   1,282 23.1     4,267 76.9   Lincoln       34,484   6,640 19.3    27,844 80.7
  Comanche     109,783  20,925 19.1    88,858 80.9    Logan        45,655   6,225 13.6    39,430 86.4
   Cotton        5,791   1,176 20.3     4,615 79.7     Love         9,848   1,975 20.1     7,873 79.9
   Craig        13,712   2,995 21.8    10,717 78.2    Major         7,607   1,283 16.9     6,324 83.1
   Creek        70,352   9,626 13.7    60,726 86.3   Marshall      16,151   4,615 28.6    11,536 71.4
   Custer       28,709   3,749 13.1    24,960 86.9    Mayes        40,545   9,043 22.3    31,502 77.7
  Delaware      41,731   9,767 23.4    31,964 76.6   McClain       38,320   5,083 13.3    33,237 86.7
   Dewey         4,817     747 15.5     4,070 84.5  McCurtain      32,567   6,794 20.9    25,773 79.1
   Ellis         4,022     611 15.2     3,411 84.8   McIntosh      19,535   4,742 24.3    14,793 75.7
  Garfield      60,115   8,793 14.6    51,322 85.4    Murray       13,493   3,213 23.8    10,280 76.2
   Garvin       27,570   4,156 15.1    23,414 84.9   Muskogee      66,135  11,787 17.8    54,348 82.2
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Oklahoma, by County: 2018
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
   Noble        11,318   2,006 17.7     9,312 82.3                                                   
   Nowata       10,202   1,700 16.7     8,502 83.3                                                   
  Okfuskee      11,107   2,138 19.2     8,969 80.8                                                   
  Oklahoma     769,559 105,033 13.6   664,526 86.4                                                   
  Okmulgee      38,209   7,686 20.1    30,523 79.9                                                   
   Osage        45,898   8,375 18.2    37,523 81.8                                                   
   Ottawa       31,112   6,203 19.9    24,909 80.1                                                   
   Pawnee       16,263   2,728 16.8    13,535 83.2                                                   
   Payne        80,177   9,378 11.7    70,799 88.3                                                   
 Pittsburg      42,445  10,047 23.7    32,398 76.3                                                   
  Pontotoc      37,864   6,071 16.0    31,793 84.0                                                   
Pottawatomie    70,067  12,797 18.3    57,270 81.7                                                   
 Pushmataha     11,001   2,988 27.2     8,013 72.8                                                   
Roger Mills      3,687     579 15.7     3,108 84.3                                                   
   Rogers       89,748  13,231 14.7    76,517 85.3                                                   
  Seminole      24,634   5,343 21.7    19,291 78.3                                                   
  Sequoyah      40,967   9,445 23.1    31,522 76.9                                                   
  Stephens      43,403   8,689 20.0    34,714 80.0                                                   
   Texas        20,998   1,590  7.6    19,408 92.4                                                   
  Tillman        7,160   1,283 17.9     5,877 82.1                                                   
   Tulsa       637,949  87,619 13.7   550,330 86.3                                                   
  Wagoner       77,559  12,894 16.6    64,665 83.4                                                   
 Washington     51,598   8,152 15.8    43,446 84.2                                                   
  Washita       11,149   1,436 12.9     9,713 87.1                                                   
   Woods         8,518   1,355 15.9     7,163 84.1                                                   
  Woodward      19,961   3,106 15.6    16,855 84.4                                                   
Count of People with Disabilities for Oklahoma, by County: 2018

Percentage of People with Disabilities for Oklahoma, by County: 2018

Discussion

There are a number of concepts and factors which complicate the interpretation of the estimates presented in this report. These concerns affect all statistics from population-based surveys. The estimates included in this document should be interpreted the following limitations in mind and generalized with caution. In each point, a link to the U.S. Census Bureau website describing the limitation or concept in greater detail in the ACS has been provided.

Additional links to resources for the ACS:

Glossary

American Community Survey (ACS) — The American Community Survey is a large, continuous demographic survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that will provide accurate and up-to-date profiles of America’s communities every year. Annual and multiyear estimates of population and housing data are generated for small areas, including tracts and population subgroups. This information is collected by mailing questionnaires to a sample of addresses. See the U.S. Census Bureau website for additional details.

The Six Disability Questions in the American Community Survey:

  1. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? (yes or no)
  2. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses? (yes or no)
  3. (If person 5 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions? (yes or no)
  4. (If person 5 years or old over) Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? (yes or no)
  5. (If person 5 years old or over) Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? (yes or no)
  6. (If person 15 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? (yes or no)

Average — The sum of all of the values in a sample divided by the number of values in the sample.

Civilian — A person not in active-duty military.

Median — The middlemost value of a sample that separates the upper half of the values from the lower half of the values. 

Non-Institutionalized Population — Describes individuals who are residing in the community and who are not living in institutions such as jails, prisons, nursing homes, hospitals, etc.

Population — The total number of inhabitants in a defined geographic area including all races, classes, and groups.

 

 

Prevalence — The proportion of the population with a particular status or condition. Prevalence is usually expressed as a percentage or a number of people per unit of the population.

Prevalence Rate — The prevalence of a particular status or condition estimated over a specific period of time.

Range — The difference between the largest and smallest values in a sample. In a sample, when the smallest value is subtracted from the largest value the resulting value is called the range. 

Sampling Variability — The variation of a statistic when estimated from repeated samples.

United States Census Bureau — An agency within the United States Federal Statistical System tasked with producing data about the American people and economy. Their primary task is to conduct the United States Census every ten years.

About the Center

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the StatsRRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: American Association of People with Disabilities, Center for Essential Management Services, Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and Public Health Institute.

The StatsRRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RTGE00010100, from 2018–2023.

Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (EPM-RRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the EPM-RRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: Association of University Centers on Disability, Hunter College, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and the University of Chicago.

The EPM-RRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RT503701, from 2015–2020.

Contact Information
University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824
Toll-Free Telephone/TTY: 866-538-9521
E-mail: Disability.Statistics@unh.edu
https://www.researchondisability.org