2019 State Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the following individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort: Deb Brucker, Erin Dame, Ferris Al Kurabi, Kate Filanoski, Kim Phillips, Karen Volle, Romy Eberle and Toni Sumner-Beebe.

Funding for this publication is made possible by:

The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), grant number 90RTGE0001; and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement (EPM-RRTC), also funded by NIDILRR, grant number 90RT5037. The information developed by the StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC does not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government (Edgar, 75.620 (b)).

The StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC are part of the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire. The Institute on Disability/UCED (IOD) was established in 1987 to provide a university-based focus for the improvement of knowledge, policies, and practices related to the lives of people with disabilities and their families and is New Hampshire’s University Center for Excellence in Disability (UCED). Located within the University of New Hampshire, the IOD is a federally designated center authorized by the Developmental Disabilities Act. Through innovative and interdisciplinary research, academic, service, and dissemination initiatives, the IOD builds local, state, and national capacities to respond to the needs of individuals with disabilities and their families.

Institute on Disability / UCED

UNH.png

10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101 | Durham, NH 03284              603-862-4320 | relay: 711 | contact.iod@unh.edu | https://www.iod.unh.edu

Stay Connected:
facebook.png instragram.png linkedin.png Twitter.jpg youtube.png       

 

Copyright 2020. Institute on Disability. University of New Hampshire.      

 

 

 

2019 Nebraska Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on

Disability Statistics and Demographics

A NIDILRR-Funded Center

NIDILIRR.jpg

Introduction

The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence are designed to provide the users of disability statistics with the number of people with disabilities for any given state and county in the United States. This report is intended to be an online complement to Section 1: Population and Prevalence of the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, providing greater detail within each state. The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence can be used to compare county-level statistics between counties in any given state or states.

The following report provides county-level statistics for Nebraska. The proportions of people with disabilities, sometimes called prevalence, presented in the State Reports for County-Level Data is a useful tool for advocates, researchers, and policy-makers to plan and provide services and supports for people with disabilities. In this report, the prevalence of people with disabilities is presented as the number of people with disabilities in a given state and county per total state and county populations, respectively. Counts and percentages are provided in tables and maps.

The data for this report come from the American Community Survey 5-year data. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a national survey developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to provide information on a number of topics about social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the U.S. population. ACS 5-year data is collected over a longer period of time than 1-year data, providing larger sample sizes and increased reliability for less populated areas and small population subgroups. All of the statistics in this report use the ACS 5-year data which includes data from the year of the report and data from the four previous years. In the ACS, people are identified as having a disability based on responses to a series of six questions asking about having difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, and independent living (see glossary for further details).

Specific to Nebraska, the state chosen for this report, sentences providing interpretation and context for prevalence statistics are included below. A short glossary of terms is also provided at the end of the report explaining the statistics that are illustrated in each sentence.

 

 

Additional Resources. The Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and its complement, the Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, are summaries of statistics about people with disabilities, available both in hard copy and online at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org.

Help navigating any of the resources described here can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions section at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org/faq. Assistance interpreting and locating additional statistics is available via our toll-free number, 866-538-9521, or by email, disability.statistics@unh.edu. For more information about our research projects, please visit https://www.researchondisability.org.

Suggested Citation. Paul, S., Rafal, M., & Houtenville, A. (2020). 2019 State Report for Nebraska County-Level Data: Prevalence. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

Interpretation

The following statements are designed to help understand the 2019 county-level statistics from Nebraska that are presented:

  • For the number of people with and without disabilities:
    • The range of total people across Nebraska counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people across Nebraska counties, was 553,164.
      • The county with the greatest number of total people was Douglas (553,559 people).
      • The county with the least number of total people was McPherson (395 people).
    • The average number of total people across all counties was 20,267.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of total people across Nebraska counties was 6,109.
  • For the number of people with disabilities:
    • The range of people with disabilities across Nebraska counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people with disabilities across Nebraska counties, was 58,417.
      • The county with the greatest number of people with disabilities was Douglas (58,463 people).
      • The county with the least number of people with disabilities was McPherson (46 people).
    • The average number of people with disabilities across all counties was 2,353.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people with disabilities across Nebraska counties was 852.
  • For the percentage of people with disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Nebraska, the overall percentage of people with disabilities is 11.6%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people with disabilities was Hooker (20.8%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people with disabilities was Sarpy and Sioux (9.5%).

 

  • For the number of people without disabilities:
    • The range of people without disabilities across Nebraska counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people without disabilities across Nebraska counties, was 494,747.
      • The county with the greatest number of people without disabilities was Douglas (495,096 people).
      • The county with the least number of people without disabilities was McPherson (349 people).
    • The average number of people without disabilities across all counties was 17,914.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people without disabilities across Nebraska counties was 5,206.
  • For the percentage of people without disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Nebraska, the overall percentage of people without disabilities is 88.4%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people without disabilities was Sarpy and Sioux (90.5%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people without disabilities was Hooker (79.2%).
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Nebraska, by County: 2019
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
  Nebraska   1,884,850 218,839 11.6 1,666,011 88.4    Dixon         5,631     715 12.7     4,916 87.3
   Adams        31,310   4,209 13.4    27,101 86.6    Dodge        36,103   4,817 13.3    31,286 86.7
  Antelope       6,275     909 14.5     5,366 85.5   Douglas      553,559  58,463 10.6   495,096 89.4
   Arthur          427      54 12.6       373 87.4    Dundy         1,877     256 13.6     1,621 86.4
   Banner          722      99 13.7       623 86.3   Fillmore       5,318     746 14.0     4,572 86.0
   Blaine          477      73 15.3       404 84.7   Franklin       2,924     493 16.9     2,431 83.1
   Boone         5,180     663 12.8     4,517 87.2   Frontier       2,630     506 19.2     2,124 80.8
 Box Butte      10,803   1,272 11.8     9,531 88.2    Furnas        4,670     892 19.1     3,778 80.9
    Boyd         1,909     303 15.9     1,606 84.1     Gage        21,284   3,319 15.6    17,965 84.4
   Brown         2,972     385 13.0     2,587 87.0    Garden        1,813     310 17.1     1,503 82.9
  Buffalo       48,640   5,860 12.0    42,780 88.0   Garfield       1,946     269 13.8     1,677 86.2
    Burt         6,415   1,032 16.1     5,383 83.9    Gosper        1,977     249 12.6     1,728 87.4
   Butler        7,861     899 11.4     6,962 88.6    Grant           718      89 12.4       629 87.6
    Cass        25,475   2,641 10.4    22,834 89.6   Greeley        2,356     327 13.9     2,029 86.1
   Cedar         8,351     951 11.4     7,400 88.6     Hall        60,411   7,466 12.4    52,945 87.6
   Chase         3,716     442 11.9     3,274 88.1   Hamilton       9,084     936 10.3     8,148 89.7
   Cherry        5,731     655 11.4     5,076 88.6    Harlan        3,366     525 15.6     2,841 84.4
  Cheyenne       9,508   1,385 14.6     8,123 85.4    Hayes           893     140 15.7       753 84.3
    Clay         6,109     903 14.8     5,206 85.2  Hitchcock       2,777     519 18.7     2,258 81.3
   Colfax       10,586   1,059 10.0     9,527 90.0     Holt        10,015   1,298 13.0     8,717 87.0
   Cuming        8,793     926 10.5     7,867 89.5    Hooker          667     139 20.8       528 79.2
   Custer       10,713   1,495 14.0     9,218 86.0    Howard        6,417     852 13.3     5,565 86.7
   Dakota       19,962   2,262 11.3    17,700 88.7  Jefferson       7,037   1,250 17.8     5,787 82.2
   Dawes         8,737   1,118 12.8     7,619 87.2   Johnson        4,107     679 16.5     3,428 83.5
   Dawson       23,462   3,163 13.5    20,299 86.5   Kearney        6,465     675 10.4     5,790 89.6
   Deuel         1,817     296 16.3     1,521 83.7    Keith         8,013   1,047 13.1     6,966 86.9
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Nebraska, by County: 2019
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
 Keya Paha         760      88 11.6       672 88.4   Saunders      20,855   2,814 13.5    18,041 86.5
  Kimball        3,579     560 15.6     3,019 84.4 Scotts Bluff    35,501   5,161 14.5    30,340 85.5
    Knox         8,232   1,177 14.3     7,055 85.7    Seward       16,890   1,875 11.1    15,015 88.9
 Lancaster     308,643  32,808 10.6   275,835 89.4   Sheridan       5,178     914 17.7     4,264 82.3
  Lincoln       34,858   5,240 15.0    29,618 85.0   Sherman        2,977     506 17.0     2,471 83.0
   Logan           927      99 10.7       828 89.3    Sioux         1,219     116  9.5     1,103 90.5
    Loup           605     101 16.7       504 83.3   Stanton        5,891     701 11.9     5,190 88.1
  Madison       34,465   3,796 11.0    30,669 89.0    Thayer        4,913     723 14.7     4,190 85.3
 McPherson         395      46 11.6       349 88.4    Thomas          645     105 16.3       540 83.7
  Merrick        7,689   1,322 17.2     6,367 82.8   Thurston       7,145     912 12.8     6,233 87.2
  Morrill        4,621     658 14.2     3,963 85.8    Valley        4,153     627 15.1     3,526 84.9
   Nance         3,450     536 15.5     2,914 84.5  Washington     20,179   2,790 13.8    17,389 86.2
   Nemaha        6,877   1,041 15.1     5,836 84.9    Wayne         9,301     946 10.2     8,355 89.8
  Nuckolls       4,176     716 17.1     3,460 82.9   Webster        3,459     499 14.4     2,960 85.6
    Otoe        15,717   2,253 14.3    13,464 85.7   Wheeler          783     101 12.9       682 87.1
   Pawnee        2,610     392 15.0     2,218 85.0     York        13,032   1,721 13.2    11,311 86.8
  Perkins        2,868     370 12.9     2,498 87.1                                                   
   Phelps        8,860   1,055 11.9     7,805 88.1                                                   
   Pierce        7,023     742 10.6     6,281 89.4                                                   
   Platte       32,893   3,306 10.1    29,587 89.9                                                   
    Polk         5,143     603 11.7     4,540 88.3                                                   
 Red Willow     10,505   1,514 14.4     8,991 85.6                                                   
 Richardson      7,816   1,289 16.5     6,527 83.5                                                   
    Rock         1,374     204 14.8     1,170 85.2                                                   
   Saline       14,025   1,658 11.8    12,367 88.2                                                   
   Sarpy       176,609  16,723  9.5   159,886 90.5                                                   
Count of People with Disabilities for Nebraska, by County: 2019

Percentage of People with Disabilities for Nebraska, by County: 2019

Discussion

There are a number of concepts and factors which complicate the interpretation of the estimates presented in this report. These concerns affect all statistics from population-based surveys. The estimates included in this document should be interpreted the following limitations in mind and generalized with caution. In each point, a link to the U.S. Census Bureau website describing the limitation or concept in greater detail in the ACS has been provided.

Additional links to resources for the ACS:

Glossary

American Community Survey (ACS) — The American Community Survey is a large, continuous demographic survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that will provide accurate and up-to-date profiles of America’s communities every year. Annual and multiyear estimates of population and housing data are generated for small areas, including tracts and population subgroups. This information is collected by mailing questionnaires to a sample of addresses. See the U.S. Census Bureau website for additional details.

The Six Disability Questions in the American Community Survey:

  1. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? (yes or no)
  2. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses? (yes or no)
  3. (If person 5 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions? (yes or no)
  4. (If person 5 years or old over) Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? (yes or no)
  5. (If person 5 years old or over) Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? (yes or no)
  6. (If person 15 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? (yes or no)

Average — The sum of all of the values in a sample divided by the number of values in the sample.

Civilian — A person not in active-duty military.

Median — The middlemost value of a sample that separates the upper half of the values from the lower half of the values. 

Non-Institutionalized Population — Describes individuals who are residing in the community and who are not living in institutions such as jails, prisons, nursing homes, hospitals, etc.

Population — The total number of inhabitants in a defined geographic area including all races, classes, and groups.

 

 

Prevalence — The proportion of the population with a particular status or condition. Prevalence is usually expressed as a percentage or a number of people per unit of the population.

Prevalence Rate — The prevalence of a particular status or condition estimated over a specific period of time.

Range — The difference between the largest and smallest values in a sample. In a sample, when the smallest value is subtracted from the largest value the resulting value is called the range. 

Sampling Variability — The variation of a statistic when estimated from repeated samples.

United States Census Bureau — An agency within the United States Federal Statistical System tasked with producing data about the American people and economy. Their primary task is to conduct the United States Census every ten years.

About the Center

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the StatsRRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: American Association of People with Disabilities, Center for Essential Management Services, Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and Public Health Institute.

The StatsRRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RTGE0001, from 2018–2023.

Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (EPM-RRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the EPM-RRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: Association of University Centers on Disability, Hunter College, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and the University of Chicago.

The EPM-RRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RT503701, from 2015–2020.

Contact Information
University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824
Toll-Free Telephone/TTY: 866-538-9521
E-mail: Disability.Statistics@unh.edu
https://www.researchondisability.org