2019 State Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the following individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort: Deb Brucker, Erin Dame, Ferris Al Kurabi, Kate Filanoski, Kim Phillips, Karen Volle, Romy Eberle and Toni Sumner-Beebe.

Funding for this publication is made possible by:

The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), grant number 90RTGE0001; and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement (EPM-RRTC), also funded by NIDILRR, grant number 90RT5037. The information developed by the StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC does not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government (Edgar, 75.620 (b)).

The StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC are part of the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire. The Institute on Disability/UCED (IOD) was established in 1987 to provide a university-based focus for the improvement of knowledge, policies, and practices related to the lives of people with disabilities and their families and is New Hampshire’s University Center for Excellence in Disability (UCED). Located within the University of New Hampshire, the IOD is a federally designated center authorized by the Developmental Disabilities Act. Through innovative and interdisciplinary research, academic, service, and dissemination initiatives, the IOD builds local, state, and national capacities to respond to the needs of individuals with disabilities and their families.

Institute on Disability / UCED

UNH.png

10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101 | Durham, NH 03284              603-862-4320 | relay: 711 | contact.iod@unh.edu | https://www.iod.unh.edu

Stay Connected:
facebook.png instragram.png linkedin.png Twitter.jpg youtube.png       

 

Copyright 2020. Institute on Disability. University of New Hampshire.      

 

 

 

2019 Tennessee Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on

Disability Statistics and Demographics

A NIDILRR-Funded Center

NIDILIRR.jpg

Introduction

The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence are designed to provide the users of disability statistics with the number of people with disabilities for any given state and county in the United States. This report is intended to be an online complement to Section 1: Population and Prevalence of the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, providing greater detail within each state. The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence can be used to compare county-level statistics between counties in any given state or states.

The following report provides county-level statistics for Tennessee. The proportions of people with disabilities, sometimes called prevalence, presented in the State Reports for County-Level Data is a useful tool for advocates, researchers, and policy-makers to plan and provide services and supports for people with disabilities. In this report, the prevalence of people with disabilities is presented as the number of people with disabilities in a given state and county per total state and county populations, respectively. Counts and percentages are provided in tables and maps.

The data for this report come from the American Community Survey 5-year data. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a national survey developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to provide information on a number of topics about social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the U.S. population. ACS 5-year data is collected over a longer period of time than 1-year data, providing larger sample sizes and increased reliability for less populated areas and small population subgroups. All of the statistics in this report use the ACS 5-year data which includes data from the year of the report and data from the four previous years. In the ACS, people are identified as having a disability based on responses to a series of six questions asking about having difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, and independent living (see glossary for further details).

Specific to Tennessee, the state chosen for this report, sentences providing interpretation and context for prevalence statistics are included below. A short glossary of terms is also provided at the end of the report explaining the statistics that are illustrated in each sentence.

 

 

Additional Resources. The Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and its complement, the Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, are summaries of statistics about people with disabilities, available both in hard copy and online at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org.

Help navigating any of the resources described here can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions section at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org/faq. Assistance interpreting and locating additional statistics is available via our toll-free number, 866-538-9521, or by email, disability.statistics@unh.edu. For more information about our research projects, please visit https://www.researchondisability.org.

Suggested Citation. Paul, S., Rafal, M., & Houtenville, A. (2020). 2019 State Report for Tennessee County-Level Data: Prevalence. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

Interpretation

The following statements are designed to help understand the 2019 county-level statistics from Tennessee that are presented:

  • For the number of people with and without disabilities:
    • The range of total people across Tennessee counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people across Tennessee counties, was 919,061.
      • The county with the greatest number of total people was Shelby (923,664 people).
      • The county with the least number of total people was Lake (4,603 people).
    • The average number of total people across all counties was 69,497.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of total people across Tennessee counties was 31,098.
  • For the number of people with disabilities:
    • The range of people with disabilities across Tennessee counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people with disabilities across Tennessee counties, was 114,057.
      • The county with the greatest number of people with disabilities was Shelby (115,010 people).
      • The county with the least number of people with disabilities was Moore (953 people).
    • The average number of people with disabilities across all counties was 10,691.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people with disabilities across Tennessee counties was 6,190.
  • For the percentage of people with disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Tennessee, the overall percentage of people with disabilities is 15.4%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people with disabilities was Hancock (29.4%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people with disabilities was Williamson (7.3%).

 

  • For the number of people without disabilities:
    • The range of people without disabilities across Tennessee counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people without disabilities across Tennessee counties, was 805,084.
      • The county with the greatest number of people without disabilities was Shelby (808,654 people).
      • The county with the least number of people without disabilities was Lake (3,570 people).
    • The average number of people without disabilities across all counties was 58,807.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people without disabilities across Tennessee counties was 24,206.
  • For the percentage of people without disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Tennessee, the overall percentage of people without disabilities is 84.6%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people without disabilities was Williamson (92.7%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people without disabilities was Hancock (70.6%).
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Tennessee, by County: 2019
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
Tennessee  6,602,261 1,015,603 15.4 5,586,658 84.6  Franklin     41,376     8,260 20.0    33,116 80.0
 Anderson     75,092    14,778 19.7    60,314 80.3   Gibson      48,099     9,226 19.2    38,873 80.8
 Bedford      47,915     7,355 15.4    40,560 84.6   Giles       28,857     4,836 16.8    24,021 83.2
  Benton      15,988     4,483 28.0    11,505 72.0  Grainger     22,958     5,474 23.8    17,484 76.2
 Bledsoe      13,636     3,686 27.0     9,950 73.0   Greene      67,539    16,091 23.8    51,448 76.2
  Blount     128,660    18,398 14.3   110,262 85.7   Grundy      13,169     3,251 24.7     9,918 75.3
 Bradley     104,628    18,809 18.0    85,819 82.0  Hamblen      63,301    11,731 18.5    51,570 81.5
 Campbell     39,155    10,137 25.9    29,018 74.1  Hamilton    356,815    52,208 14.6   304,607 85.4
  Cannon      13,997     2,447 17.5    11,550 82.5  Hancock       6,417     1,886 29.4     4,531 70.6
 Carroll      27,376     6,139 22.4    21,237 77.6  Hardeman     21,590     4,441 20.6    17,149 79.4
  Carter      55,390    11,663 21.1    43,727 78.9   Hardin      25,278     4,345 17.2    20,933 82.8
 Cheatham     39,814     5,951 14.9    33,863 85.1  Hawkins      55,941    12,788 22.9    43,153 77.1
 Chester      16,930     2,263 13.4    14,667 86.6  Haywood      17,395     3,602 20.7    13,793 79.3
Claiborne     31,098     6,892 22.2    24,206 77.8 Henderson     27,599     5,091 18.4    22,508 81.6
   Clay        7,557     1,411 18.7     6,146 81.3   Henry       31,794     7,211 22.7    24,583 77.3
  Cocke       35,256     8,266 23.4    26,990 76.6  Hickman      23,094     4,743 20.5    18,351 79.5
  Coffee      54,520     9,508 17.4    45,012 82.6  Houston       7,955     1,428 18.0     6,527 82.0
 Crockett     14,184     2,535 17.9    11,649 82.1 Humphreys     18,211     3,843 21.1    14,368 78.9
Cumberland    58,597    12,915 22.0    45,682 78.0  Jackson      11,469     2,762 24.1     8,707 75.9
 Davidson    680,957    78,352 11.5   602,605 88.5 Jefferson     52,725    10,481 19.9    42,244 80.1
  DeKalb      19,596     3,403 17.4    16,193 82.6  Johnson      15,777     3,386 21.5    12,391 78.5
 Decatur      11,444     1,944 17.0     9,500 83.0    Knox      457,097    55,197 12.1   401,900 87.9
 Dickson      52,292     9,062 17.3    43,230 82.7    Lake        4,603     1,033 22.4     3,570 77.6
   Dyer       36,879     7,102 19.3    29,777 80.7 Lauderdale    23,153     5,006 21.6    18,147 78.4
 Fayette      39,584     6,448 16.3    33,136 83.7  Lawrence     42,913     7,895 18.4    35,018 81.6
 Fentress     18,034     4,201 23.3    13,833 76.7   Lewis       11,841     2,188 18.5     9,653 81.5
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Tennessee, by County: 2019
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
 Lincoln      33,573     6,371 19.0    27,202 81.0   Sevier      96,046    17,446 18.2    78,600 81.8
  Loudon      51,966     7,231 13.9    44,735 86.1   Shelby     923,664   115,010 12.5   808,654 87.5
  Macon       23,460     4,607 19.6    18,853 80.4   Smith       19,546     3,163 16.2    16,383 83.8
 Madison      96,293    13,727 14.3    82,566 85.7  Stewart      13,223     2,675 20.2    10,548 79.8
  Marion      28,247     6,190 21.9    22,057 78.1  Sullivan    155,319    32,011 20.6   123,308 79.4
 Marshall     32,607     5,398 16.6    27,209 83.4   Sumner     181,810    25,852 14.2   155,958 85.8
  Maury       90,866    11,891 13.1    78,975 86.9   Tipton      60,467     9,907 16.4    50,560 83.6
  McMinn      52,219    10,618 20.3    41,601 79.7 Trousdale      9,335     1,565 16.8     7,770 83.2
 McNairy      25,506     4,911 19.3    20,595 80.7   Unicoi      17,440     3,908 22.4    13,532 77.6
  Meigs       11,997     2,392 19.9     9,605 80.1   Union       19,304     3,443 17.8    15,861 82.2
  Monroe      45,514     9,387 20.6    36,127 79.4 Van Buren      5,653     1,472 26.0     4,181 74.0
Montgomery   185,802    28,127 15.1   157,675 84.9   Warren      40,169     8,550 21.3    31,619 78.7
  Moore        6,282       953 15.2     5,329 84.8 Washington   125,931    22,081 17.5   103,850 82.5
  Morgan      18,692     4,056 21.7    14,636 78.3   Wayne       14,612     3,070 21.0    11,542 79.0
  Obion       29,908     6,611 22.1    23,297 77.9  Weakley      33,062     6,308 19.1    26,754 80.9
 Overton      21,775     3,403 15.6    18,372 84.4   White       26,399     4,863 18.4    21,536 81.6
  Perry        7,804     1,708 21.9     6,096 78.1 Williamson   224,921    16,527  7.3   208,394 92.7
 Pickett       4,999     1,125 22.5     3,874 77.5   Wilson     135,542    18,054 13.3   117,488 86.7
   Polk       16,562     2,760 16.7    13,802 83.3                                                   
  Putnam      76,513    11,154 14.6    65,359 85.4                                                   
   Rhea       32,372     6,629 20.5    25,743 79.5                                                   
  Roane       52,392     9,910 18.9    42,482 81.1                                                   
Robertson     69,307    10,484 15.1    58,823 84.9                                                   
Rutherford   313,400    33,876 10.8   279,524 89.2                                                   
  Scott       21,638     6,038 27.9    15,600 72.1                                                   
Sequatchie    14,579     3,590 24.6    10,989 75.4                                                   
Count of People with Disabilities for Tennessee, by County: 2019

Percentage of People with Disabilities for Tennessee, by County: 2019

Discussion

There are a number of concepts and factors which complicate the interpretation of the estimates presented in this report. These concerns affect all statistics from population-based surveys. The estimates included in this document should be interpreted the following limitations in mind and generalized with caution. In each point, a link to the U.S. Census Bureau website describing the limitation or concept in greater detail in the ACS has been provided.

Additional links to resources for the ACS:

Glossary

American Community Survey (ACS) — The American Community Survey is a large, continuous demographic survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that will provide accurate and up-to-date profiles of America’s communities every year. Annual and multiyear estimates of population and housing data are generated for small areas, including tracts and population subgroups. This information is collected by mailing questionnaires to a sample of addresses. See the U.S. Census Bureau website for additional details.

The Six Disability Questions in the American Community Survey:

  1. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? (yes or no)
  2. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses? (yes or no)
  3. (If person 5 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions? (yes or no)
  4. (If person 5 years or old over) Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? (yes or no)
  5. (If person 5 years old or over) Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? (yes or no)
  6. (If person 15 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? (yes or no)

Average — The sum of all of the values in a sample divided by the number of values in the sample.

Civilian — A person not in active-duty military.

Median — The middlemost value of a sample that separates the upper half of the values from the lower half of the values. 

Non-Institutionalized Population — Describes individuals who are residing in the community and who are not living in institutions such as jails, prisons, nursing homes, hospitals, etc.

Population — The total number of inhabitants in a defined geographic area including all races, classes, and groups.

 

 

Prevalence — The proportion of the population with a particular status or condition. Prevalence is usually expressed as a percentage or a number of people per unit of the population.

Prevalence Rate — The prevalence of a particular status or condition estimated over a specific period of time.

Range — The difference between the largest and smallest values in a sample. In a sample, when the smallest value is subtracted from the largest value the resulting value is called the range. 

Sampling Variability — The variation of a statistic when estimated from repeated samples.

United States Census Bureau — An agency within the United States Federal Statistical System tasked with producing data about the American people and economy. Their primary task is to conduct the United States Census every ten years.

About the Center

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the StatsRRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: American Association of People with Disabilities, Center for Essential Management Services, Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and Public Health Institute.

The StatsRRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RTGE0001, from 2018–2023.

Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (EPM-RRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the EPM-RRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: Association of University Centers on Disability, Hunter College, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and the University of Chicago.

The EPM-RRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RT503701, from 2015–2020.

Contact Information
University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824
Toll-Free Telephone/TTY: 866-538-9521
E-mail: Disability.Statistics@unh.edu
https://www.researchondisability.org