2015 State Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the following individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort: Deb Brucker, Erin Dame, Adam Lavoie, Rachel Coleman, Kate Filanoski, Karen Volle, and Anna Brennan-Curry.

Funding for this publication is made possible by:

The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), grant number 90RTGE0001-01-00; and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement (EPM-RRTC), also funded by NIDILRR, grant number 90RT5037-03-00. The information developed by the StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC does not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government (Edgar, 75.620 (b)).

The StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC are part of the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire. The Institute on Disability/UCED (IOD) was established in 1987 to provide a university-based focus for the improvement of knowledge, policies, and practices related to the lives of people with disabilities and their families and is New Hampshire’s University Center for Excellence in Disability (UCED). Located within the University of New Hampshire, the IOD is a federally designated center authorized by the Developmental Disabilities Act. Through innovative and interdisciplinary research, academic, service, and dissemination initiatives, the IOD builds local, state, and national capacities to respond to the needs of individuals with disabilities and their families.

Institute on Disability / UCED

UNH.png

10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101 | Durham, NH 03284              603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | contact.iod@unh.edu | https://www.iod.unh.edu

Stay Connected:
facebook.png instragram.png linkedin.png Twitter.jpg youtube.png       

 

Copyright 2019. Institute on Disability. University of New Hampshire.      

 

 

 

2015 Iowa Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on

Disability Statistics and Demographics

A NIDILRR-Funded Center

NIDILIRR.jpg

Introduction

The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence are designed to provide the users of disability statistics with the number of people with disabilities for any given state and county in the United States. This report is intended to be an online complement to Section 1: Population and Prevalence of the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, providing greater detail within each state. The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence can be used to compare county-level statistics between counties in any given state or states.

The following report provides county-level statistics for Iowa. The proportions of people with disabilities, sometimes called prevalence, presented in the State Reports for County-Level Data is a useful tool for advocates, researchers, and policy-makers to plan and provide services and supports for people with disabilities. In this report, the prevalence of people with disabilities is presented as the number of people with disabilities in a given state and county per total state and county populations, respectively. Counts and percentages are provided in tables and maps.

The data for this report come from the American Community Survey 5-year data. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a national survey developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to provide information on a number of topics about social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the U.S. population. ACS 5-year data is collected over a longer period of time than 1-year data, providing larger sample sizes and increased reliability for less populated areas and small population subgroups. All of the statistics in this report use the ACS 5-year data which includes data from the year of the report and data from the four previous years. In the ACS, people are identified as having a disability based on responses to a series of six questions asking about having difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, and independent living (see glossary for further details).

Specific to Iowa, the state chosen for this report, sentences providing interpretation and context for prevalence statistics are included below. A short glossary of terms is also provided at the end of the report explaining the statistics that are illustrated in each sentence.

 

 

Additional Resources. The Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and its complement, the Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, are summaries of statistics about people with disabilities and are available both in hard copy and online at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org.

Help navigating any of the resources described here can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions section at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org/faq. Assistance interpreting and locating additional statistics is available via our toll-free number, 866.538.9521, or by email, disability.statistics@unh.edu. For more information about our research projects, please visit https://www.researchondisability.org.

Suggested Citation. Boege, S.L., Lauer, E.A., & Houtenville, A.J., 2019. 2015 State Report for Iowa County-Level Data: Prevalence. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

Interpretation

The following statements are designed to help understand the 2015 county-level statistics from Iowa that are presented:

  • For the number of people with and without disabilities:
    • The range of total people across Iowa counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people across Iowa counties, was 443,622.
      • The county with the greatest number of total people was Polk (447,444 people).
      • The county with the least number of total people was Adams (3,822 people).
    • The average number of total people across all counties was 30,799.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of total people across Iowa counties was 15,093.
  • For the number of people with disabilities:
    • The range of people with disabilities across Iowa counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people with disabilities across Iowa counties, was 46,190.
      • The county with the greatest number of people with disabilities was Polk (46,791 people).
      • The county with the least number of people with disabilities was Adams (601 people).
    • The average number of people with disabilities across all counties was 3,559.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people with disabilities across Iowa counties was 1,996.
  • For the percentage of people with disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Iowa, the overall percentage of people with disabilities is 11.6%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people with disabilities was Decatur (18.0%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people with disabilities was Story (7.0%).

 

  • For the number of people without disabilities:
    • The range of people without disabilities across Iowa counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people without disabilities across Iowa counties, was 397,432.
      • The county with the greatest number of people without disabilities was Polk (400,653 people).
      • The county with the least number of people without disabilities was Adams (3,221 people).
    • The average number of people without disabilities across all counties was 27,240.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people without disabilities across Iowa counties was 13,226.
  • For the percentage of people without disabilities: 
    • For the entire state of Iowa, the overall percentage of people without disabilities is 88.4%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people without disabilities was Story (93.0%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people without disabilities was Decatur (82.0%).
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Iowa, by County: 2015
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
    Iowa      3,049,107 352,372 11.6 2,696,735 88.4     Davis         8,627   1,081 12.5     7,546 87.5
    Adair         7,287   1,135 15.6     6,152 84.4    Decatur        8,140   1,466 18.0     6,674 82.0
    Adams         3,822     601 15.7     3,221 84.3   Delaware       17,342   2,023 11.7    15,319 88.3
  Allamakee      13,753   1,583 11.5    12,170 88.5  Des Moines      39,707   5,605 14.1    34,102 85.9
  Appanoose      12,538   1,996 15.9    10,542 84.1   Dickinson      16,758   2,449 14.6    14,309 85.4
   Audubon        5,719     723 12.6     4,996 87.4    Dubuque       94,656  10,359 10.9    84,297 89.1
   Benton        25,566   2,886 11.3    22,680 88.7     Emmet         9,645   1,230 12.8     8,415 87.2
 Black Hawk     131,212  15,342 11.7   115,870 88.3    Fayette       20,234   2,868 14.2    17,366 85.8
    Boone        25,769   3,643 14.1    22,126 85.9     Floyd        15,841   2,180 13.8    13,661 86.2
   Bremer        24,176   2,307  9.5    21,869 90.5   Franklin       10,336   1,331 12.9     9,005 87.1
  Buchanan       20,745   2,117 10.2    18,628 89.8    Fremont        6,983   1,042 14.9     5,941 85.1
 Buena Vista     20,234   1,892  9.4    18,342 90.6    Greene         9,059   1,469 16.2     7,590 83.8
   Butler        14,705   1,479 10.1    13,226 89.9    Grundy        12,255   1,289 10.5    10,966 89.5
   Calhoun        9,381   1,301 13.9     8,080 86.1    Guthrie       10,602   1,382 13.0     9,220 87.0
   Carroll       20,266   2,257 11.1    18,009 88.9   Hamilton       15,093   2,009 13.3    13,084 86.7
    Cass         13,329   2,040 15.3    11,289 84.7    Hancock       10,940   1,230 11.2     9,710 88.8
    Cedar        18,133   2,128 11.7    16,005 88.3    Hardin        16,849   2,095 12.4    14,754 87.6
 Cerro Gordo     42,822   5,818 13.6    37,004 86.4   Harrison       14,218   2,101 14.8    12,117 85.2
  Cherokee       11,460   1,572 13.7     9,888 86.3     Henry        18,884   2,389 12.7    16,495 87.3
  Chickasaw      12,116   1,658 13.7    10,458 86.3    Howard         9,320   1,138 12.2     8,182 87.8
   Clarke         9,142   1,123 12.3     8,019 87.7   Humboldt        9,557   1,138 11.9     8,419 88.1
    Clay         16,255   2,201 13.5    14,054 86.5      Ida          6,942     896 12.9     6,046 87.1
   Clayton       17,569   2,138 12.2    15,431 87.8     Iowa         16,095   1,770 11.0    14,325 89.0
   Clinton       47,870   6,157 12.9    41,713 87.1    Jackson       19,381   2,446 12.6    16,935 87.4
  Crawford       17,051   2,293 13.4    14,758 86.6    Jasper        35,023   5,189 14.8    29,834 85.2
   Dallas        74,382   5,656  7.6    68,726 92.4   Jefferson      17,173   1,763 10.3    15,410 89.7
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Iowa, by County: 2015
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
   Johnson      137,748  10,109  7.3   127,639 92.7 Pottawattamie    92,061  13,445 14.6    78,616 85.4
    Jones        19,236   2,419 12.6    16,817 87.4   Poweshiek      18,388   2,249 12.2    16,139 87.8
   Keokuk        10,168   1,578 15.5     8,590 84.5   Ringgold        4,874     744 15.3     4,130 84.7
   Kossuth       15,022   1,943 12.9    13,079 87.1      Sac          9,907   1,238 12.5     8,669 87.5
     Lee         34,700   5,714 16.5    28,986 83.5     Scott       168,281  17,342 10.3   150,939 89.7
    Linn        214,649  21,868 10.2   192,781 89.8    Shelby        11,770   1,798 15.3     9,972 84.7
   Louisa        11,141   1,277 11.5     9,864 88.5     Sioux        34,084   2,502  7.3    31,582 92.7
    Lucas         8,598   1,297 15.1     7,301 84.9     Story        92,861   6,510  7.0    86,351 93.0
    Lyon         11,553   1,233 10.7    10,320 89.3     Tama         17,098   2,146 12.6    14,952 87.4
   Madison       15,457   1,858 12.0    13,599 88.0    Taylor         6,111     877 14.4     5,234 85.6
   Mahaska       22,162   2,903 13.1    19,259 86.9     Union        12,435   1,894 15.2    10,541 84.8
   Marion        32,999   4,084 12.4    28,915 87.6   Van Buren       7,365   1,021 13.9     6,344 86.1
  Marshall       39,971   5,166 12.9    34,805 87.1    Wapello       34,926   5,063 14.5    29,863 85.5
    Mills        14,622   2,487 17.0    12,135 83.0    Warren        46,957   5,311 11.3    41,646 88.7
  Mitchell       10,545   1,091 10.3     9,454 89.7  Washington      21,694   3,020 13.9    18,674 86.1
   Monona         8,876   1,366 15.4     7,510 84.6     Wayne         6,282   1,031 16.4     5,251 83.6
   Monroe         7,866   1,000 12.7     6,866 87.3    Webster       35,536   5,220 14.7    30,316 85.3
 Montgomery      10,272   1,837 17.9     8,435 82.1   Winnebago      10,395   1,436 13.8     8,959 86.2
  Muscatine      42,430   4,694 11.1    37,736 88.9  Winneshiek      20,604   1,687  8.2    18,917 91.8
   O'Brien       13,886   1,747 12.6    12,139 87.4   Woodbury      101,578  12,602 12.4    88,976 87.6
   Osceola        6,107     851 13.9     5,256 86.1     Worth         7,462   1,013 13.6     6,449 86.4
    Page         14,734   2,491 16.9    12,243 83.1    Wright        12,757   1,655 13.0    11,102 87.0
  Palo Alto       9,005   1,379 15.3     7,626 84.7                                                    
  Plymouth       24,561   2,531 10.3    22,030 89.7                                                    
 Pocahontas       6,967     870 12.5     6,097 87.5                                                    
    Polk        447,444  46,791 10.5   400,653 89.5                                                    
Count of People with Disabilities for Iowa, by County: 2015

Percentage of People with Disabilities for Iowa, by County: 2015

Discussion

There are a number of concepts and factors which complicate the interpretation of the estimates presented in this report. These concerns affect all statistics from population-based surveys. The estimates included in this document should be interpreted the following limitations in mind and generalized with caution. In each point, a link to the U.S. Census Bureau website describing the limitation or concept in greater detail in the ACS has been provided.

Additional links to resources for the ACS:

Glossary

American Community Survey (ACS) — The American Community Survey is a large, continuous demographic survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that will provide accurate and up-to-date profiles of America’s communities every year. Annual and multiyear estimates of population and housing data are generated for small areas, including tracts and population subgroups. This information is collected by mailing questionnaires to a sample of addresses. See the U.S. Census Bureau website for additional details.

The Six Disability Questions in the American Community Survey:

  1. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? (yes or no)
  2. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses? (yes or no)
  3. (If person 5 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions? (yes or no)
  4. (If person 5 years or old over) Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? (yes or no)
  5. (If person 5 years old or over) Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? (yes or no)
  6. (If person 15 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? (yes or no)

Average — The sum of all of the values in a sample divided by the number of values in the sample.

Civilian — A person not in active-duty military.

Median — The middlemost value of a sample that separates the upper half of the values from the lower half of the values. 

Non-Institutionalized Population — Describes individuals who are residing in the community and who are not living in institutions such as jails, prisons, nursing homes, hospitals, etc.

Population — The total number of inhabitants in a defined geographic area including all races, classes, and groups.

Prevalence — The proportion of the population with a particular status or condition. Prevalence is usually expressed as a percentage or a number of people per unit of the population.

Prevalence Rate — The prevalence of a particular status or condition estimated over a specific period of time.

Range — The difference between the largest and smallest values in a sample. In a sample, when the smallest value is subtracted from the largest value the resulting value is called the range. 

Sampling Variability — The variation of a statistic when estimated from repeated samples.

United States Census Bureau — An agency within the United States Federal Statistical System tasked with producing data about the American people and economy. Their primary task is to conduct the United States Census every ten years.

About the Center

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the StatsRRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: American Association of People with Disabilities, Center for Essential Management Services, Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and Public Health Institute.

The StatsRRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RTGE00010100, from 2018–2023.

Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (EPM-RRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the EPM-RRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: Association of University Centers on Disability, Hunter College, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and the University of Chicago.

The EPM-RRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RT503701, from 2015–2020.

Contact Information
University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824
Toll-Free Telephone/TTY: 866-538-9521
E-mail: Disability.Statistics@unh.edu
https://www.researchondisability.org