2015 State Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the following individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort: Deb Brucker, Erin Dame, Adam Lavoie, Rachel Coleman, Kate Filanoski, Karen Volle, and Anna Brennan-Curry.

Funding for this publication is made possible by:

The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), grant number 90RTGE0001-01-00; and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement (EPM-RRTC), also funded by NIDILRR, grant number 90RT5037-03-00. The information developed by the StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC does not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government (Edgar, 75.620 (b)).

The StatsRRTC and EPM-RRTC are part of the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire. The Institute on Disability/UCED (IOD) was established in 1987 to provide a university-based focus for the improvement of knowledge, policies, and practices related to the lives of people with disabilities and their families and is New Hampshire’s University Center for Excellence in Disability (UCED). Located within the University of New Hampshire, the IOD is a federally designated center authorized by the Developmental Disabilities Act. Through innovative and interdisciplinary research, academic, service, and dissemination initiatives, the IOD builds local, state, and national capacities to respond to the needs of individuals with disabilities and their families.

Institute on Disability / UCED

UNH.png

10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101 | Durham, NH 03284              603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | contact.iod@unh.edu | https://www.iod.unh.edu

Stay Connected:
facebook.png instragram.png linkedin.png Twitter.jpg youtube.png       

 

Copyright 2019. Institute on Disability. University of New Hampshire.      

 

 

 

2015 Oklahoma Report for County-Level Data: Prevalence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on

Disability Statistics and Demographics

A NIDILRR-Funded Center

NIDILIRR.jpg

Introduction

The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence are designed to provide the users of disability statistics with the number of people with disabilities for any given state and county in the United States. This report is intended to be an online complement to Section 1: Population and Prevalence of the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, providing greater detail within each state. The State Reports for County-Level Data on Prevalence can be used to compare county-level statistics between counties in any given state or states.

The following report provides county-level statistics for Oklahoma. The proportions of people with disabilities, sometimes called prevalence, presented in the State Reports for County-Level Data is a useful tool for advocates, researchers, and policy-makers to plan and provide services and supports for people with disabilities. In this report, the prevalence of people with disabilities is presented as the number of people with disabilities in a given state and county per total state and county populations, respectively. Counts and percentages are provided in tables and maps.

The data for this report come from the American Community Survey 5-year data. The American Community Survey (ACS) is a national survey developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to provide information on a number of topics about social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the U.S. population. ACS 5-year data is collected over a longer period of time than 1-year data, providing larger sample sizes and increased reliability for less populated areas and small population subgroups. All of the statistics in this report use the ACS 5-year data which includes data from the year of the report and data from the four previous years. In the ACS, people are identified as having a disability based on responses to a series of six questions asking about having difficulties with vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, self-care, and independent living (see glossary for further details).

Specific to Oklahoma, the state chosen for this report, sentences providing interpretation and context for prevalence statistics are included below. A short glossary of terms is also provided at the end of the report explaining the statistics that are illustrated in each sentence.

 

 

Additional Resources. The Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and its complement, the Annual Disability Statistics Supplement, are summaries of statistics about people with disabilities and are available both in hard copy and online at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org.

Help navigating any of the resources described here can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions section at https://www.disabilitycompendium.org/faq. Assistance interpreting and locating additional statistics is available via our toll-free number, 866.538.9521, or by email, disability.statistics@unh.edu. For more information about our research projects, please visit https://www.researchondisability.org.

Suggested Citation. Boege, S.L., Lauer, E.A., & Houtenville, A.J., 2019. 2015 State Report for Oklahoma County-Level Data: Prevalence. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

Interpretation

The following statements are designed to help understand the 2015 county-level statistics from Oklahoma that are presented:

  • For the number of people with and without disabilities:
    • The range of total people across Oklahoma counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people across Oklahoma counties, was 739,765.
      • The county with the greatest number of total people was Oklahoma (742,083 people).
      • The county with the least number of total people was Cimarron (2,318 people).
    • The average number of total people across all counties was 48,941.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of total people across Oklahoma counties was 21,633.
  • For the number of people with disabilities:
    • The range of people with disabilities across Oklahoma counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people with disabilities across Oklahoma counties, was 98,610.
      • The county with the greatest number of people with disabilities was Oklahoma (98,888 people).
      • The county with the least number of people with disabilities was Cimarron (278 people).
    • The average number of people with disabilities across all counties was 7,621.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people with disabilities across Oklahoma counties was 3,949.
  • For the percentage of people with disabilities:
    • For the entire state of Oklahoma, the overall percentage of people with disabilities is 15.6%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people with disabilities was Marshall (30.8%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people with disabilities was Texas (9.3%).

 

  • For the number of people without disabilities:
    • The range of people without disabilities across Oklahoma counties, also known as the difference between the largest and smallest counts of people without disabilities across Oklahoma counties, was 641,155.
      • The county with the greatest number of people without disabilities was Oklahoma (643,195 people).
      • The county with the least number of people without disabilities was Cimarron (2,040 people).
    • The average number of people without disabilities across all counties was 41,319.
    • The median, also known as the middle-most number, of people without disabilities across Oklahoma counties was 18,443.
  • For the percentage of people without disabilities: 
    • For the entire state of Oklahoma, the overall percentage of people without disabilities is 84.4%.
      • The county with the highest percentage of people without disabilities was Texas (90.7%).
      • The county with the lowest percentage of people without disabilities was Marshall (69.2%).
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Oklahoma, by County: 2015
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
  Oklahoma   3,768,424 586,824 15.6 3,181,600 84.4    Grady        53,037   8,051 15.2    44,986 84.8
   Adair        22,137   4,060 18.3    18,077 81.7    Grant         4,439     724 16.3     3,715 83.7
  Alfalfa        4,722     786 16.6     3,936 83.4    Greer         5,041   1,003 19.9     4,038 80.1
   Atoka        12,472   2,912 23.3     9,560 76.7    Harmon        2,760     539 19.5     2,221 80.5
   Beaver        5,451     515  9.4     4,936 90.6    Harper        3,750     426 11.4     3,324 88.6
  Beckham       21,633   3,190 14.7    18,443 85.3   Haskell       12,781   2,918 22.8     9,863 77.2
   Blaine        8,081   1,670 20.7     6,411 79.3    Hughes       12,105   2,452 20.3     9,653 79.7
   Bryan        43,563   8,413 19.3    35,150 80.7   Jackson       24,460   3,710 15.2    20,750 84.8
   Caddo        28,250   5,146 18.2    23,104 81.8  Jefferson       6,189   1,291 20.9     4,898 79.1
  Canadian     124,317  16,096 12.9   108,221 87.1   Johnston      10,902   2,814 25.8     8,088 74.2
   Carter       47,815   8,419 17.6    39,396 82.4     Kay         44,921   7,804 17.4    37,117 82.6
  Cherokee      47,520   8,011 16.9    39,509 83.1  Kingfisher     15,143   2,570 17.0    12,573 83.0
  Choctaw       14,942   3,224 21.6    11,718 78.4    Kiowa         9,103   1,860 20.4     7,243 79.6
  Cimarron       2,318     278 12.0     2,040 88.0   Latimer       10,566   2,496 23.6     8,070 76.4
 Cleveland     263,176  33,756 12.8   229,420 87.2   Le Flore      48,745  10,182 20.9    38,563 79.1
    Coal         5,746   1,157 20.1     4,589 79.9   Lincoln       34,103   6,759 19.8    27,344 80.2
  Comanche     112,215  19,785 17.6    92,430 82.4    Logan        44,138   5,367 12.2    38,771 87.8
   Cotton        5,990   1,223 20.4     4,767 79.6     Love         9,578   1,566 16.3     8,012 83.7
   Craig        14,004   3,112 22.2    10,892 77.8    Major         7,636   1,471 19.3     6,165 80.7
   Creek        69,960  11,432 16.3    58,528 83.7   Marshall      15,782   4,864 30.8    10,918 69.2
   Custer       28,530   4,279 15.0    24,251 85.0    Mayes        40,570   8,108 20.0    32,462 80.0
  Delaware      41,030   9,037 22.0    31,993 78.0   McClain       36,235   5,009 13.8    31,226 86.2
   Dewey         4,759     821 17.3     3,938 82.7  McCurtain      32,725   6,574 20.1    26,151 79.9
   Ellis         4,095     588 14.4     3,507 85.6   McIntosh      19,972   4,704 23.6    15,268 76.4
  Garfield      60,096   8,652 14.4    51,444 85.6    Murray       13,324   2,613 19.6    10,711 80.4
   Garvin       27,215   3,949 14.5    23,266 85.5   Muskogee      67,393  12,661 18.8    54,732 81.2
Prevalence of People with and without Disabilities for Oklahoma, by County: 2015
County Total Disability No Disability   County Total Disability No Disability
Count % Count % Count % Count %
   Noble        11,406   1,888 16.6     9,518 83.4                                                   
   Nowata       10,351   1,962 19.0     8,389 81.0                                                   
  Okfuskee      11,348   2,579 22.7     8,769 77.3                                                   
  Oklahoma     742,083  98,888 13.3   643,195 86.7                                                   
  Okmulgee      38,801   7,630 19.7    31,171 80.3                                                   
   Osage        46,626   8,839 19.0    37,787 81.0                                                   
   Ottawa       31,642   5,819 18.4    25,823 81.6                                                   
   Pawnee       16,343   3,000 18.4    13,343 81.6                                                   
   Payne        78,326   8,757 11.2    69,569 88.8                                                   
 Pittsburg      43,047   9,283 21.6    33,764 78.4                                                   
  Pontotoc      37,600   5,850 15.6    31,750 84.4                                                   
Pottawatomie    68,859  12,058 17.5    56,801 82.5                                                   
 Pushmataha     11,097   3,199 28.8     7,898 71.2                                                   
Roger Mills      3,757     511 13.6     3,246 86.4                                                   
   Rogers       88,221  13,374 15.2    74,847 84.8                                                   
  Seminole      25,041   5,169 20.6    19,872 79.4                                                   
  Sequoyah      41,092   9,862 24.0    31,230 76.0                                                   
  Stephens      44,204   8,521 19.3    35,683 80.7                                                   
   Texas        21,458   1,988  9.3    19,470 90.7                                                   
  Tillman        7,350   1,331 18.1     6,019 81.9                                                   
   Tulsa       618,184  82,266 13.3   535,918 86.7                                                   
  Wagoner       75,082  11,605 15.5    63,477 84.5                                                   
 Washington     51,358   8,455 16.5    42,903 83.5                                                   
  Washita       11,426   1,400 12.3    10,026 87.7                                                   
   Woods         8,321   1,132 13.6     7,189 86.4                                                   
  Woodward      19,966   2,411 12.1    17,555 87.9                                                   
Count of People with Disabilities for Oklahoma, by County: 2015

Percentage of People with Disabilities for Oklahoma, by County: 2015

Discussion

There are a number of concepts and factors which complicate the interpretation of the estimates presented in this report. These concerns affect all statistics from population-based surveys. The estimates included in this document should be interpreted the following limitations in mind and generalized with caution. In each point, a link to the U.S. Census Bureau website describing the limitation or concept in greater detail in the ACS has been provided.

Additional links to resources for the ACS:

Glossary

American Community Survey (ACS) — The American Community Survey is a large, continuous demographic survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau that will provide accurate and up-to-date profiles of America’s communities every year. Annual and multiyear estimates of population and housing data are generated for small areas, including tracts and population subgroups. This information is collected by mailing questionnaires to a sample of addresses. See the U.S. Census Bureau website for additional details.

The Six Disability Questions in the American Community Survey:

  1. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? (yes or no)
  2. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses? (yes or no)
  3. (If person 5 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions? (yes or no)
  4. (If person 5 years or old over) Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? (yes or no)
  5. (If person 5 years old or over) Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? (yes or no)
  6. (If person 15 years old or over) Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? (yes or no)

Average — The sum of all of the values in a sample divided by the number of values in the sample.

Civilian — A person not in active-duty military.

Median — The middlemost value of a sample that separates the upper half of the values from the lower half of the values. 

Non-Institutionalized Population — Describes individuals who are residing in the community and who are not living in institutions such as jails, prisons, nursing homes, hospitals, etc.

Population — The total number of inhabitants in a defined geographic area including all races, classes, and groups.

Prevalence — The proportion of the population with a particular status or condition. Prevalence is usually expressed as a percentage or a number of people per unit of the population.

Prevalence Rate — The prevalence of a particular status or condition estimated over a specific period of time.

Range — The difference between the largest and smallest values in a sample. In a sample, when the smallest value is subtracted from the largest value the resulting value is called the range. 

Sampling Variability — The variation of a statistic when estimated from repeated samples.

United States Census Bureau — An agency within the United States Federal Statistical System tasked with producing data about the American people and economy. Their primary task is to conduct the United States Census every ten years.

About the Center

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the StatsRRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: American Association of People with Disabilities, Center for Essential Management Services, Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and Public Health Institute.

The StatsRRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RTGE00010100, from 2018–2023.

Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (EPM-RRTC)

Led by the University of New Hampshire, the EPM-RRTC is a collaborative effort involving the following partners: Association of University Centers on Disability, Hunter College, Kessler Foundation, Mathematica Policy Research, and the University of Chicago.

The EPM-RRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RT503701, from 2015–2020.

Contact Information
University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824
Toll-Free Telephone/TTY: 866-538-9521
E-mail: Disability.Statistics@unh.edu
https://www.researchondisability.org